SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Justin Franks who wrote (3937)9/6/1998 2:07:00 AM
From: craig crawford  Respond to of 21876
 
>> I'm not pulling #'s out of my ass. I have a PHD in economics <<

I have a high school diploma. When it comes to the stock market I eat PHD's like you for lunch.



To: Justin Franks who wrote (3937)9/6/1998 3:47:00 AM
From: ed  Respond to of 21876
 
Your PHD did not mean anything, especially a PHD of no economic knowledge !!!



To: Justin Franks who wrote (3937)9/6/1998 4:57:00 AM
From: ed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21876
 
Mr. Franks,

You claimed that you have a PHD in economy. Let me give you a lesson in economy here, maybe you can understand, I hope so.

As you know inflation means the cost of living goes up , which also means the employee of corp America ask for higher salary to balance out the effect of higher cost for their food, gas, and housing, and other expense, it also means the
cost of Corp America goes up , and they have to increase the price of their products
to maintain the profit margin. So, all in all, the purpose of cutting inflation is to
improve the living standard of Americans and the profit margins of corp America ,
and to maintain the ability of corp America to compete in the world market by holding the cost. That is if you can hold your cost while your competitors' cost
is keeping going up, then you can compete. Now, look at what is happening in the world, the competitors' cost is keeping down by devaluation of their currency, while the US corps is holding their cost steady , relatively speaking , the US corp's cost is going up, as a result , the US corp can not compete in the world market, and American's living standard will go down . What cause all this ? High interest. The current interest is way too high relative to the value of dollar comparing to the currency of other countries. As a result of high rate, the cost of money is high for corp America, high rate in US also make the value of dollar high comparing to the rest of the world, this also degrade the ability of American Corps to compete in the world market. Relative high rate also reduce the consumption of consumers, and this also hurt the profit margin of corp America further, as a result bankruptcy, reduce salary, cutting workforce, and a chain reaction start from here. AG's speech in Berkley indicated that he probably has sense the danger ahead by holding the current rate. The rate, the value of currency, the salary, the profit margin of corps make the balance of the economy, i.e the confidence of consumers. AG better act fast than late to cut the rate , probably 0.25% in September, and another 0.25% in October. Otherwise, once we drop into a recession or depression, the rest of the world will be in a bigger economic crisis, and AG realize that we can not get away from it. Recession means less revenue for the Government, and budget deficit, and government compete with corp America for money , which also means higher rate,
and less consumption, and bankruptcy and unemployment everywhere, it also means we repeat the nightmare of 1977 to 1980, high rate, high deficit and high unemployment.

So, the happy result is lower rate, continue stable economic expansion, and the rest of the world get out of the financial crisis, especially Japan, and the stock market continues its healthy up trend, surplus of budget for Fed. So, the short should be very careful as the steps of Sep and OCT is getting closer.

Conclusion : There are two sides in the story of rate. To increase the rate to reduce consumption, and demand, and cool down the economy. This generally happen when the supply is smaller than deman, so by reducing the demand, you cut the inflation. To reduce rate to encourage consumption, i.e increase consumption, so that producers can maintain a reasonable profit margin to survive . This generally happen when the supply is larger than the demand, and this is what is happening now .



To: Justin Franks who wrote (3937)9/6/1998 3:36:00 PM
From: X Y Zebra  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21876
 
I'm not pulling #'s out of my ass. I have a PHD in economics. A number of factors (when combined) will drive YHOO (and others) back to reasonable levels. ......


....It would take more than 1hr for me to type something up to explain things. Besides, what I have to say would be chopped down by anyone who lacks insight/understanding of economics.


Really ?

Would PHD, mean: Pedantry Honorary Degree.... if so....According to H L Mencken:

"The honorary degree is a way of honoring a pompous ass. No honest person would accept a degree he hadn't worked for. Honorary degrees are suitable only for realtors, chiropractors and presidents of the United States. "

Economists are like weathermen, they are always making predictions, and rarely succeeding..... besides, nobody listens to them.....

And that is when they are modest, the arrogants, such as yourself, are mocked and laughed at.

People take pictures of them and use them as posters in "Pin the tail on the arse" games in parties for the asylum inmates.

As for me, I have stored your predictions in memory and will revisit them in say, one year from now..... if you are right, then I guess I will say "I am sorry, you were right".

But if not..... I will ask you to send your picture to the asylum of your choice.

Z.

p.s. The above took me about 3 minutes to type. (give or take a few, basis points). And taht's no bull !



To: Justin Franks who wrote (3937)9/8/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: larry  Respond to of 21876
 
JF,

Not to try to show no respect to your PHD degree since I am also going to do a MBA next year. But like Craig mentioned, the PHD degree is not going to help you in trading.

All my buddies who are in MBA or have graduated lost big bucks as soon as they get into the sucker school. My best friend was up 200% in the 2 years before he went to business school, and now since he went to the school half a year ago, he has lost more than 60% of his value in his portfolio.

In the SI AMZN thread, there are several professors who teach economics in the Ivy league schools. They are all down big in the last two to three years. One guy lost over a million dollars shorting YHOO!, AMZN, and AOL (he covered with probably a more than 200% loss). I don't want to go on and on since there are so many examples out there. My advice to you is that your PHD degree is not going to help you pick the winners. Trend is your best friend.

Here is to hope that I won't become a sucker in two years.

good luck,
larry!



To: Justin Franks who wrote (3937)9/8/1998 1:46:00 PM
From: jach  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21876
 
LU should be around 100
YHOO should be around as far as one can see
CSCO - 120
AMZN - can be infinity
MSFT - 140ish



To: Justin Franks who wrote (3937)9/8/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: jach  Respond to of 21876
 
Message 5693851



To: Justin Franks who wrote (3937)9/8/1998 10:09:00 PM
From: Mad Duck  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21876
 
Justin - if you have a PhD in economics why don't you clean up your profile....



To: Justin Franks who wrote (3937)9/14/1998 2:50:00 PM
From: Jock Hutchinson  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 21876
 
Justin: After having reviewed a number of your posts, I am quite certain that you do not posses any PhD, much less a PhD in economics. If you do posses a PhD in economics, I would really like to know what institution granted you said degree. What your are is a hapless person who has delusions of grandeur.