Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Cade Industries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (3178)	9/6/1998 6:29:00 AM
From: Patric	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3563

Lund's Board seat? Thought it was O'Gorman or Sandford that was on Avcorp's board. I've heard nothing, but then again that would be normal. Do you think one of these companies could handle the acquisition of the other? If so, which one would be the likely acquiror, and why (both of their web sites indicate they are looking to acquire other companies). It would have to be a friendly acquisition or merger, it would seem to me. I can certainly see some possible synergies and economies. Would be interesting to watch. Acquisitions/mergers don't always lead to higher share price, though (witness Tellabs-Ciena). #\|~}>

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (3178)	9/7/1998 9:14:00 PM
From: MechanicalMethod	Respond to of 3563

Just my opinion, not intended to encourage rumor: I maintain a long position in CADE as a core holding, and I've looked at AVCORP's financials. I believe AVCORP would be a good acquisition for CADE. There are numerous synergy's. Both are heavily into high tech plastic composites as just one example In order to maintain the geometric doubling of revenue/earnings CADE needs to be looking at a merger/acquisition with someone equal in size or larger than themselves. I've no worries about the integrity of CADE's management nor concerns about which name would survive. I support management in whatever they choose. If a merger/acquisition occurs, it would be a win/win situation for both, and a win for me as a shareholder. There is nothing here intended to contribute to rumor. I don't participate on that level of conversation, but will listen if anyone cares to discuss reality. I'm a true believer in the future of this company. If you see rumor, squash it. Repeating, there has NOT been any news to indicate any of this will ever become a reality. It is simple speculation based on my own personal analysis of the odds that it may become reality. osci