Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : SANGUINE CORP. (SGNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Ankley who wrote (3908)	9/6/1998 2:55:00 PM
From: R>G>	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5402

Thanks Mike, I agree Forthright was trying to pull the wool of everybodys eyes. Did he ever say what companies that we got funding capital for? Did he ever say what his capacity was? Head of investment group, manager, or typist? Did he ever to the valuation model for SGNC? Did he ever show us his real research on the company, if I remember right, we were all going to be surprised?? Only thing I do remember is something about he could only find 2 employees in the company.HAHAHAHA I guess if you don't count Battelle that makes some sense. However I believe it was cost effective for SGNC to sub some of this work out rather than build buildings and hire people themselves. The way my football teams are doing this weekend, I think i'll just wait for the Red Wings to start playing soon. HAHAHA R>G>

To: Mike Ankley who wrote (3908)	9/6/1998 8:25:00 PM
From: Dixie7777	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5402

Forthright's a dirtball with an attitude. It's got the talk but not the walk. No one's convinced that these bashers, forthright included, are not involved with making a buck for their bashing activities. While he may sound like he knows where he comes from, keep in mind that the average BB player posting here on SI don't know squat. When anyone comes along and sounds like an authority many of the posters and most of the lurkers ascribe a certain amount of credibility. While it works in favor of the hypster, and I'm sure you'll all agree that that happens here often enpough, it is far more effective with the basher. After all, a hypster cannot easily make anyone buy a stock, but a basher will easily compell the sale of a stock due to the thin conviction of all too many of the SI investors. Forthright, no matter what it's specific knowledge of any specific subject, is still an anomaly. Never trust an SI anomaly. Rich