SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Endosonics(eson) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dr.john who wrote (155)9/16/1998 7:51:00 PM
From: dr.john  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 205
 
Great experience, being talking to oneself!

5 Mio shares changing hands shortly before the close: I cannot imagine any other institution than the Liechtenstein fund selling, which owned some 25+ % of Endosonics (if I remember correctly) early this summer. I hope it won't be Kam aswell, but they had "only" 750'000 shares as of end of July. I think the Liechtenstein fund bought as-well (earlier this year) shares previously hold by WFC (some 5% of outstanding). All in all this could make up to 5 mio shares (16 Mio shares outstanding).

If the Liechtenstein guys sell it's probably a good buying opportunity; It an European fund with a new top management (earlier this year), and they are by no means specialists in this field. Don't know how they got into ESON in the first place, that was probably the same question asked by the relatively new management. (Cave: this is my own speculation, no supporting background information; but it makes sense to me).

4,5 USD is practically an all-time low, and the fundamentals for the company are improving (IVBT, angioplasty vs stenting, recent positive earnings surprise, share-buyback announcement by ESON);

PS: % of insider ownership?



To: dr.john who wrote (155)9/16/1998 11:18:00 PM
From: longfellow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 205
 
Regarding insider ownership. Does not appear to be very high. Two sources show institutional ownership as 79% and 92%. Don't really know which one is correct. First one is Yahoo, second is Vickers.