To: Jon Koplik who wrote (14673 ) 9/7/1998 1:24:00 PM From: marginmike Read Replies (2) | Respond to
Yap ,Yap,Yap goes the same old debate. I have argued With Tero to no avail. I have taken the battle to the Nokia thread were Tero dishes his propaganda to all to hear. He is a little more careful here then there. He knows we will call his opinions as such. After listening to his mutable argument grow like a chameleon in changing seasons, I have decided that he is best ignored. He isn't savvy enough to realize CDMA will be the best thing to happen to NOKIA. If he is not insightful enough to see how much CDMA is going to the bottomline at Nokia, It is futile for him to see its benefits to Qcom. When, not If, Cdma migrates to Europe and China Nokia will be in almost an equal position to Qcom having being the 1st major manufacturer to build CDMA alongside the mighty Q. The experience it has gained and advantage over Erickson is irreparable already. Why did Nokia migrate so fast to CDMA tero? According to you it is less advantageous then GSM? Your 1st love can recognize the potential yet you refuse. Nokia's recent successes have had as much to do with MOTANIC and ERICSHIt's refusal to adopt CDMA quickly, as the 6160's sales. I would think that going forward the same would apply to WCDMA and CDMA2000. But enough about TERO, here are some facts:
