SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cavalry who wrote (4214)9/8/1998 2:05:00 AM
From: s martin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26163
 
Seems you've already forgotten your lie about how you sent TON to a lab and they told you it wasn't stevia... your nose is growing.

To: +Icabod (36 )
From: +Cavalry Tuesday, Sep 8 1998 1:50AM ET
Reply # of 41

icabod my scarey friend, tell me how to prove to si that touch of nature is not stevia, help me icabod, dont post wackiness, steer me in the path to the truth how can we scientifically prove it's not repackaged stevia but the next giant winner.
Cavalry
ps icabod says is not scientific proof



To: Cavalry who wrote (4214)9/8/1998 2:08:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26163
 
tomorrow we will figure out how to prove to world that t-o-n is not stevia but a completely new form of sweetener. baby steps my good man

That's easy.

First of all, we've been told that four people from Monsanto and AZNT recently met to discuss something or other. As Touch of Nature is AZNT's flagship product, I think it logical to assume that it was at least a major topic of conversation. I think we can also agree that there is no way AZNT would try to misrepresent TON to Monsanto as anything other than what it really is supposed to be: a unique product from the amazon rain forest which is "not stevia" and "the farthest thing from stevia there can be".

Thus, it is my contention that by determining the AZNT-Monsanto relationship via five short questions, we can prove once and for all whether TON is really a stevia product.

So, once again:
1. When did the relationship start and what was the nature of it?
2. Is the relationship still active and what is the nature of it?
3. If specific products were discussed (as opposed to an offer involving all the products or the company as a whole), what products were they?
4. At various points on this thread Touch of Nature has been described as a stevia hybrid. Did Monsanto and AZNT ever specifically have discussions about any stevia related product?
5. Did Monsanto approach AZNT or did AZNT approach Monsanto?

- Jeff



To: Cavalry who wrote (4214)9/8/1998 8:16:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 26163
 
..one piece at a time soon the world will know aznt's name

Well, I hope your right Cavalry.

And I also hope that it is positive notoriety.

But I also realize that there is quite a few pieces to the puzzle this company has not provided, the most important IMO being the conversion restrictions on the new preferred to new common.

Good luck and we'll all see what happens. Either way, Friday's "Greenspeak" session has certainly turned the market around. S&P futures are up 25 points this morning. And overseas market have been strong all week long.

Wheeewwww!!!!

Regards,

Ron