Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (1786)	9/8/1998 7:34:00 AM
From: jimpit	Respond to of 67261

YYESSSSS !

To: Zoltan! who wrote (1786)	9/8/1998 7:55:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 67261

meant "devastating".

To: Zoltan! who wrote (1786)	9/8/1998 11:08:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 67261

Zolt, it is ironic that because Clinton apparently in his Aug 27th testimony insisted that his answers in the Jones deposition were "legally accurate", that Starr is now obligated to include in the report to Congress the graphic descriptions of exactly which sex acts were done between him and Monica. I say "apparently", because Clinton said those words in his TV address to the nation that evening, but we can probably presume, but don't know for sure that he insisted the same thing in his videotaped testimony to "the Inquisitor, Kenneth of Starr" -g-. IMO Clinton has mistakenly assumed that it is somehow okay to commit perjury, as long as it's about sex. But of course the perjury law doesn't say that.