Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RocketMan who wrote (25156)	9/8/1998 8:37:00 AM
From: bullmarket	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Germany, Russia......pieces of the puzzle beginning to be put in place. If Jimmy Chin is able to make deals with these European/former East bloc countries, who is to say he cannot do the same thing with other Eoropean/East bloc countries that are now growing and need the latest in IP telephony????? Hmm..........

To: RocketMan who wrote (25156)	9/8/1998 10:40:00 AM
From: dgivinvestor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

STILL UNDECIDED ABOUT INVESTING IN DGIV..? read this. I met with several individuals on my business trip last Thursday evening. Based on our conversations, they have committed to me that they intend to buy a very large quantity of dgiv stock over the next couple of weeks (sorry, the exact number is confidential). AND THIS COULD BE JUST THE BEGINNING FOR THESE GUYS! Again, NOW is the time to get in. Don't wait!

To: RocketMan who wrote (25156)	9/8/1998 10:51:00 AM
From: risk-averse	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

Nice synopsis RM. The commodity here is minutes of long distance usage and what piece of the pie we get. Anyone know how many minutes these regions account for?

To: RocketMan who wrote (25156)	9/9/1998 2:32:00 AM
From: SalmonMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Hi Crew. Lots of catching up to do. RM, did I miss something in your translation of the PR? "Russian domestic long distance revenues reached US $8.2 Billion in 1997, while international long distance calling generated $1.5 Billion." "Let's say 98 revs instead of 9.7B$ (8.2$ + 1.5$) are only 5B$. Further, let's say that these numbers were all in rubles, and with devaluation the equivalent dollar amount is just 20% of that, so that makes it 1B$. Now, if Digitcom gets 10% of that revenue, that is 100 million dollars in revenue. Too high? OK, say Digitcom gets 5 percent revenue. That is still 50 million dollars in revenue per year!" Seems like PR numbers reflect combined total domestic/int. LD revenues, not revenues for our partners St. Petersburg NIT/El-Ros alone. How would Digitcom get 5% of total revs (rubles, dollars or otherwise) of all Russian LD minutes? Even if the stated revenues were for our partnering companies, how could we expect 5% of their revenues? This PR is exciting and shows that we are jumping through the proper technical and political hoops, but it would be that much more rewarding if we knew more in regards to actual financial structure of these agreements (% of revs., currency of transactions, etc.) and the profit margins achievable in Russia, before arriving at a figure for earnings per share from these particular contracts. Jeff