Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David K. who wrote (11948)	9/8/1998 11:07:00 AM
From: patrick tang	Respond to of 14577

Perhaps now people on this thread will look at Tom's Hardware site with a different light - what Tom said was the Savage at minimum has driver 'immaturity'. Perhaps this is why all these people picked ATI instead of Savage, which is clearly performance winner and with 0.25um, potential to be price winner. Just hope this is just driver problem that can be sorted out soon if not already and does not need new C rev silicon. patrick

To: David K. who wrote (11948)	9/8/1998 1:32:00 PM
From: patrick tang	Respond to of 14577

Another review, more driver/competability problems. Even heat problem with the 0.25um!! These graphic cards really need 0.21um. hardwarecentral.com I am really amazed that they still have all these problems. In retrospect, my G200 loaded without a hitch on a FIC 503+/Win95/98 system. Pretty touch to get OEMs, nobody wants to deal with customer complaints and tech handholdings. patrick