SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : New Sky Communications (NSKY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: vagabond who wrote (2278)9/8/1998 1:09:00 PM
From: MskiHntr  Respond to of 2601
 
Good day all, sorry for the delay, been a little busy (Thankfully)
Level II with 429,000 shs traded

2 @ 0.022...1 @ 0.025
1 @ 0.021...1 @ 0.026
2 @ 0.020...1 @ 0.027
1 @ 0.015...1 @ 0.028
2 @ 0.010...1 @ 0.030
............2 @ 0.035
............1 @ 0.040

Best,



To: vagabond who wrote (2278)9/8/1998 1:20:00 PM
From: Retaylor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2601
 
Vagabond,

That was a very good question, and I emailed Colleen with your concerns. After reading your post it concerns me also, and I think that it should be looked into by NSKY.

Beside the similarity between the two titles, I do not think that the title "Freak Talks About Sex" is a very appealing title anyways, and it surely doesn't give you any insight of what the movie is about.

I also gave Colleen an example of how important a movie title can be.

The movie starring Demi Moore called "GI JANE", which actually was a good movie, did poorly because when people looked at the title and not knowing what the movie was about, declined to see it thinking it to be some stupid movie. A title can sometimes make or break a film in regards to theatrical release.

I read the information I just posted about "GI JANE" and how it said that they screwed up with the title. It also mentioned that a lot of hours go in to choosing a title, sometimes days/weeks.

I will post Colleen's response, when she gets back to me.

Retaylor



To: vagabond who wrote (2278)9/8/1998 1:20:00 PM
From: vagabond  Respond to of 2601
 
Re-posting Weblink...

I'd thought that in my previous post, the Web address for "Let's Talk About Sex" would show up as a hyper-link for everyone's convenience. But it didn't work -- apparently because I left out the "http", thinking that it was causing a problem. Turns out now that I was wrong about that, so I'll try posting the address again...

flf.com

Hope that one comes out OK...