Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael T Currie who wrote (1553)	9/8/1998 5:15:00 PM
From: Cliff Daniel	Respond to of 4711

Gee Michael, I didn't know that was a prerequisite to this thread. I was hoping to possibly learn something here. Maybe you should hang out on the Flame Thread, being that is what you seem to like.

To: Michael T Currie who wrote (1553)	9/8/1998 8:40:00 PM
From: Wizzer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4711

Can't spell, though, can you, Cliff? Besides, I think you went a little excessive on the commas in your reply. Doesn't make sense :-) Actually, I will have to side with Cliff on that one. Your sentence would have been better served with only one or two commas maximum. "Can't spell though, can you Cliff?", or, "Can't spell, though, can you Cliff?" would have been better. Nevertheless, your third comma is definitely extraneous. Reading your original sentence sounds like this: "Can't spell <pause> though <pause> can you <pause> Cliff?" No malice intended. Regards, Wisam