Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bill Wexler's Profits of DOOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AHM who wrote (2459)	9/8/1998 6:14:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4634

"but this does not give him the privilege of saying that company's and their managements have perpetrated fraud unless he has facts to support such allegations." I wish you would get your facts straight. The above statement is incorrect. I am really tired of this entire argument. I wish you would study up a little. You would find that any company that files a lawsuit as in your example may be shorted with impunity. Exactly what is your motive in posting on this thread? Is it an attempt to shut up those who have exposed some of the pump and dumps operating on the market? Do you get a kick out of disrupting a thread with off topic babble? I suggested you go back to the 8/19 time frame and read the argument we had on this topic then. It pretty much covers it all. Oh, BTW, I'm pretty sure the SEC is mostly concerned with people that are pumping up their worthless stocks on the 'net. But as long as there are people taking people for millions of dollars selling shares in a time machine company and the like, I doubt they're going to take the time to challenge the Constitution and people's right to post their opinions on an opinion thread. Barb

To: AHM who wrote (2459)	9/8/1998 8:11:00 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4634

You may be right about Wexler - but this does not give him the privilege of saying that company's and their managements have perpetrated fraud unless he has facts to support such allegations. True as far as it goes, and if he is ever taken into court I do hope for his sake he has said facts at the ready. However, he is under no obligation to provide a full accounting for said facts, on demand, on any Internet message board where someone might choose to "call him out".