SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bearded One who wrote (10602)9/8/1998 8:50:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Respond to of 74651
 
Sure Bearded One, I'll add a comment or two. (on zdnet.com

Public sentiment toward Microsoft seems to be taking a downward turn and spiraling out of control. At least that's what you'd think if you read some of the feedback that ZDNet's Charles Cooper got for his harsh review of Wendy Rohm's new anti-Microsoft book, The Microsoft File: The Secret Case Against Bill Gates. It appears that defending Microsoft is getting more and more difficult. In fact, it may be too late for the company to recover easily from the bad publicity its business practices are engendering.

I don't know about that, though as a hearts and minds guy I figure the "brutally competitive" image is at least more honest than Bill's "politically naive software engineer" / "all I care about is great software" lines. Honest in a broader sense than the Microsoftese "China paying for Microsoft software". I actually posted something to that talkback, didn't make it in though. Not that it was inflammatory, I just noted that ZD had come out with a couple stories last week (partially) confirming things from Wendy's book.

Even the letter writers who praise Microsoft are using propagandistic language that reflects poorly on Microsoft.

Personally, I've noticed a lot of cheesy high school debate tricks, but propagandistic? I guess I'm so used to the heavy handed "War is peace, ignorance is strength, Windows is Open" stuff that comes from Bill himself, I don't notice his backers so much. I don't know how to classify the "Bill Gates is John Galt" line, propaganda doesn't seem right for that.

Eventually, nobody is going to want to do deals with Microsoft. And who will want to develop for a Microsoft platform? Nobody, that's who. Microsoft, in fact, is digging its own grave.

That conclusion seems a bit premature. But, you see bits of this, like when Bill told the cable guys "Don't be paranoid / WinCE will be just like Windows". John Malone heeded Andy Grove instead, and called up Scott McNealy. Developers can't quite ignore Windows, it's what people run. It'd be nice if it sucked less, though. There's also been various reports about total developer disinterest in WinCE and J++. Anyway, I thought Dvorak had better advise in this old column.

Advice for Microsoft zdnet.com

1. Shut up. Over the past few years Microsoft has talked too much. And I don't mean talking to the press about the glories of Office 97. I mean spouting off. Curiously, it's mostly Bill Gates himself rather than his flame-throwing sidekick Steve Ballmer who's blown the most smoke. Ballmer has been told to shut up while Gates appears on TV, makes keynote speeches everywhere possible to plead his case, and does quickie interviews with everyone who will listen. Heck, did you see his TV ad for Callaway golf clubs? What was the point of that? Exactly why the media wasn't all over that appearance still baffles me. Gates, over time, has adopted many Japanese-like attitudes when it comes to business, but he's ignored the Japanese philosophy of keeping a low profile.

To repeat, it takes a real genius to turn a fairly arcane and technical antitrust case into the techno-geek trial of the century. Another area where Andy Grove rules, IMHO.

Cheers, Dan.