Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : JMAR Technologies(JMAR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Falstaff who wrote (6566)	9/8/1998 8:20:00 PM
From: Starlight	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9695

Falstaff and Kerry - Thanks for your clarification on ISO 9001. Sounds like it's still better to have it than not have it though. Regarding the message filter, I'll withdraw my backing on that idea. I think you're right, Kerry, that it will just cause confusion since if we delete SOME messages, others in response to those won't make sense. It seems in the last two days, I've been "annoyed" by more posters - on several threads - than usual. There's a real fight going on on one of the threads I read, and one person has been "put in SI jail". That's where the message filter idea got started - (not by me). I'll just have to avoid that thread for awhile and simmer down. Betty

To: Falstaff who wrote (6566)	9/8/1998 11:31:00 PM
From: henry jakala	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9695

Certainly it is not the stock valuation, which is subject to capricious variation and manipulation. Certainly it should be based on something more ojective and measurable, like revenues, profitablity, growth, and growth potential, don't you think on a day when Dow +5% Nasdaq +6% Russell 2000 +4% and JMAR -11% i'd say the tape tells the story especially seeing the dumping that occurred late today in my experience the tape has usually been more correct about long term prospects than any fundamentals nobody that counts gives a rat's behind about JMAR at this point Martinez has been out on quite a few dog n pony shows and still no interest in JMAR seems to me JMAR has tons of overhead resistance and it'll take a long time to plow through it unfortunately maybe wall street is populated with analysts incapable of understanding their technology - but somehow i doubt it it's all well n good that some small newsletter like the Savvy Investor likes JMAR but of what good is it other than to draw in some short term holders looking for a pop to sell into to ? somebody knows something and that somebody isn't us - just as was the situation with the Swiss where JMAR management kept us in the dark until it was too late to do anything about it while we scratched our heads wondering why JMAR was on a relentless slide