Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : THNS - Technest Holdings (Prev. FNTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: watcher who wrote (5497)	9/9/1998 9:27:00 AM
From: Cliff Daniel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15313

Watcher, With all do respect Sir, there is no such thing as an open discussion on a BB thread that is already in the process of being played, or has been played out. Simple fact is that someone needs to view the good side and someone needs to view the bad side. But the person presenting the bad side, or potential bad side, is said to have an agenda. Come to think of it we all have agendas in everyday life. The good here have an agenda to pump this stock up for their benefit. I'm said to present the bad side, or possible bad side, for my benefits. However, I dervive no benefit from the declining stock price. The "Goods" would rather spend day in and day out researching why the "Bad" is posting, whereas that time would be better spent researching WHAT the Bad is posting. Asking to have an open conversation is like asking to end racism. It will never happen. At least not in our time. However unfortunate that may be. Cliff

To: watcher who wrote (5497)	9/9/1998 12:05:00 PM
From: JW@KSC	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 15313

Re: "Let's talk openly on the thread" Jim Wilkinson: Like I said, your response to "real" questions that do not involve "hype the stock" will show others on the thread that you may be one of those insiders! Keep trying with your partners to cloud the objectives of this thread and you will find that they are not as stupid as you think. As to my e-mail, sorry... I'm not as perfect as you! I will correct my mistake. By the way, why does that matter. Lets talk openly on the thread. Watcher, Like I said, your response to "real" questions that do not involve "hype the stock" will show others on the thread that you may be one of those insiders! Now let me get this straight, If I respond to real questions, and answer without hype everyone will know I'm an insider? Keep trying with your partners to cloud the objectives of this thread and you will find that they are not as stupid as you think. JW@KSC Clouding objectives of this thread. Sorry I follow, but don't post often enough to cloud anything here. So tell me, what is the objective, I'm accused of clouding? As to my e-mail, sorry... I'm not as perfect as you! Sorry if I were more perfect, I'd have My DMT <vbg> ;^) Providing a valid E-mail address is just one way of proving I'm not one of those insiders you've been saying the thread is full of. Company Employee's, especially of a company which has filed to become Fully Reporting, or those that are fully reporting, are not about to post on an Investment thread on their Co. Give us a break, they may have someone follow the thread as a watchdog, Whoops, perhaps a pretty watchdog! But a CEO/CFO/CTO etc., posting in this mad house give me a break, I don't think so Tim! SI and other investment threads about a company, are Hornets Nests to Fully Reporting companies, you just don't stick your head in! It's hard enough just trying not to get stung! When having to talk with many online investors, knowing their comments will so up here or there and be relayed to other investment threads around the NET. So please refrain from your suggesting there are insiders posting here, thank you. Ref: "Please feel free to comment but don't waste my time by trying to change the subject or bash me too! Those that normally bash will do so again. Go ahead... then will know that you are probably one of those insiders!!!" There are "many" on SI: who know personally that I am not an insider of FNTN or any of it's affiliates. I've been on SI: since Xmas 1995. I have done DD on many companies, and by attending a couple of SuperCom's and Network Interop Shows and reported on my findings both from the show floor, plus after Press Conferences, and reports after my return. A highlight of those trips was meeting/dinner with many Thread members. Lets talk openly on the thread. Why would I want to talk to you openly, or any other way for that manner? From your posts, the few made since the creation of your new SI account this week, I can see already that they are so full of twists and turns I need a Porsche just to keep up with you. TO EVERYONE:I CANT HOLD IT IN ANY LONGER! I have been reading this thread for some time now. The pain in my side is killing me from laughter! Clif--- I say let these people get what they deserve. The blind leads the blind.... Sorry Watcher, even with your late, 3rd party email address addition (jailler@hotmail.com), I'm not interested. CLICK JW@KSC