Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maxwell who wrote (36838)	9/9/1998 1:40:00 PM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570724

Maxwell, Re: "As a friendly advice, you should cover your AMD shorts quickly ..." I will take your advice under consideration ... However Maxwell, your "track record" on investment is not very good. Didn't you ride AMD down from $40+ to about $15 ?? Also, your technical knowledge is weak ... eg. your mythical damascene process flow. On second thought, maybe I will keep my AMD short position. <ggg> Make It So, Yousef

To: Maxwell who wrote (36838)	9/9/1998 1:40:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570724

Maxwell, Yes they have made plenty. You just don't think about it. You spouted off eleven so-called missteps made by Intel, but you forgot the best one: #12) Intel's Approxium can't even perform division accurately. All the Intel-haters had a ball with this one back in 94 and 95, remember? I think even AMD or Cyrix had an magazine ad which hinted that their processors doesn't make mathematical mistakes, unlike the Pentium. How quickly even the anti-Intel people forget. Tenchusatsu