Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paunch who wrote (34089)	9/9/1998 5:47:00 PM
From: go4it	Respond to of 35569

Thanks, I had heard rumors of the potential for papers to be written to better explain the mineralization by independent sources but nothing ever came from it to my knowledge. These papers would have proven good for funding purposes but I always wanted a mine to be built not a lesson in acadamia. I wish all of these reports and documents would have been opened to share holders with a non-disclosure agreement attached. Good and bad alike. Hopefully this is not the end. I never got up with Jay Taylor either unfortunately either. Been too busy lately. Obviously not too busy to post this message but hey what can I say.........

To: Paunch who wrote (34089)	9/9/1998 5:51:00 PM
From: Tim Hall	Respond to of 35569

Paunch, The core part of Black Rock was renewed by Omega. The hard rock stuff that was staked by IPM was actually released a year ago, (Aug 31, 1997). I believe that was right after they staked it. Strange that they went to all of that trouble and then did not renew. Maybe they knew about November in August. Since the Black Rock property is in Omega' hands, why don't you just get together whoever is interested and take out an option with Omega. Why would you want to drag all of IPM dirty laundry through a fresh start? Tim