SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David B. Higgs who wrote (32594)9/9/1998 7:44:00 PM
From: CGarcia  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 97611
 
"What the hell does married guys cheating on their wives have to do with perjury and obstruction of justice? In a few more days, those who continue to support the president will finally learn this is not about sex."

And you sir, as well as I, will be poorer in the process ;)



To: David B. Higgs who wrote (32594)9/9/1998 9:47:00 PM
From: Dr. Id  Respond to of 97611
 
**OT** What the hell does married guys cheating on their wives have to do with perjury and obstruction of
justice? In a few more days, those who continue to support the president will finally learn this is not
about sex.


No, it's not about sex, it's about partisan politics. However, that doesn't excuse what Clinton did. I have no problem with his having an affair if he wants to, but he did it with a 22 year old intern who was an employee of the White House (which constitutes sexual harassment as he was definitely in a power position, no matter who initiated what) while he was being sued for sexual harassment. What judgment. I believe he should be censured by the senate and the House, but I don't believe he should be impeached (unless Starr has alot more hard evidence of his obstructing justice, not just more inuendo and speculation).
Who's next in line? Al Gore, who is about to be investigated for the illegal campaign contribution problem.
Next after Gore? Newt Gingrich, who left his wife when she had cancer.

We are in fine shape! :-)

JB



To: David B. Higgs who wrote (32594)9/10/1998 8:02:00 AM
From: tonyt  Respond to of 97611
 
>In a few more days....

Try months. Congress may not even look at this before they leave Oct.