Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (2197)	9/9/1998 9:39:00 PM
From: Bill Grant	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Moderate right wing liberals are a definable type. The nazi party were moderate (at first) right and left wing but not liberal. Socialist communists have learned a trick or two and put on the liberal wetsuit and get all smarmy and politically correct. They remain law and order atavistic so that is the right wing side.>> I stand by my comment, though I will retract deranged and substitute that your argument is false or specious if that makes a difference to you, because what you have done is to take definitions out of a time context and placed them in an illogical amalgam. That combination -- the combined characteristics of "moderate" "right wing" "left wing" and "liberal" simply do not exist in any individual and cannot exist in any group with a chance to survive. In other words, moderate can coexist with right wing or conservative, and moderate can coexist with left wing or liberal. But any group containing liberals or conservatives will be warring to annex the moderates. There is no definable type that embodies both extremes.