SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DD™ who wrote (4343)9/9/1998 10:17:00 PM
From: j g cordes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Double D.. the Drudge slant misinterprets Starr's motives in my opinion.

Starr realized that Congress's viewing of closed grand jury testimony could be theoretically be blocked by arguing the rights of witnesses would be compromised.

He wanted an early opinion on being able to deliver his report to Congress without legal impediment from the White House. Kendall did begin to raise this issue, which accelerated Starr's prepartion and shipping.

Regarding Starr going for an impeachment report in July.. Starr's been going for an impeachment report from day one.



To: DD™ who wrote (4343)9/9/1998 11:14:00 PM
From: pz  Respond to of 13994
 
DRUDGE REPORT
By Matt Drudge
Wed Sep 09 1998 20:46:56 ET
x x x x x

EXCLUSIVE: REPORT INCLUDES UP TO 30 COUNTS OF IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES

There are approximately 30 separate impeachable offenses outlined in the
Starr report that was submitted to Congress on Wednesday, the DRUDGE REPORT
has learned.

Several sources close to the case describe the 'overloading' of evidence
that was included in the report.