Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (4356)	9/9/1998 10:59:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13994

<< IF the GJ didn't get Clinton's side it's because Clinton refused to cooperate. >> A question noone has asked is: "What is a horney President supposed to do?" It's a serious question. Everyone seems to think that the only human on earth that doesn't get horney is the President. So, on one, or more, weak nights, a Presidential affair takes place, after which a tenacious bulldog, Starr, with an unlimited budget tries to entrap the President. President Clinton tries to avoid the trap, as would most of the men in this country. He really felt that he could get away with it, and he didn't want to subject himself, his family, and our country to worldwide embarrassment. So......... Clinton tried not to cooperate, as would most other men in the same situation (except if it were me, it wouldn't of been Monica!) However, this doesn't change my original point that the Starr Grand Jury, after several years of captivity, would side with and befriend their captors. Regards, Bob

To: DMaA who wrote (4356)	9/9/1998 11:16:00 PM
From: Doughboy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

David, don't buy the BS from Starr. That's not how the GJ or any kind of prosecution works. Starr could not call the President before the GJ (first, because it is constitutionally suspect whether the POTUS can be subject to a subpoena and second, because a target of investigation is never called to testify because it is assumed that he or she would simply plead the Fifth). So he was taunting the POTUS, the target of his investigation, that he is guilty until he produces exculpatory evidence. What a shame that Starr would stoop so low. Doughboy.