SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should Clinton resign? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zoltan! who wrote (59)9/10/1998 1:16:00 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 567
 
THE QUICKER IT'S OVER, THE BETTER FOR WALL STREET

By JOHN CRUDELE

WALL STREET has to hope the 36 boxes of information on
impeachable offenses Kenneth Starr delivered to Congress
doesn't lead to marathon hearings on whether Bill Clinton
should stay in office.

But that's exactly what's likely to happen.

The stock market showed just how vulnerable it is to the
upcoming political turmoil yesterday, when the Dow fell 156
points, giving up almost 40 percent of the gains of the previous
day.

And the loss could be blamed on nothing but the Starr report -
first, rumors of its imminent arrival and then the delivery late in
the day

It's becoming apparent Clinton won't remain in office to the end
of his term. The only question that remains now is: How long will
it take?

Obviously, as far as investors are concerned, the quicker this
thing is over the better. Wall Street can take a sudden shock.
But it can't take another lingering problem on top of the Asian
economic turmoil.

News organizations have reported that the militants in the
White House have seized the day and are vowing to
counterattack Starr relentlessly.

Others are expecting a quick end to this impeachment matter
because leaders of the Democratic party will step in and
convince Clinton to quit.

Both those views miss reality.

Here are the problems:

Clinton can't quit unless he is given a full pardon for the alleged
crimes reported to Congress - and those excluded from the
report. Otherwise, private citizen Clinton could end up in jail.

Ken Starr accused Bill Clinton of a double-digit number of
felonies in his report to Congress. So the offenses aren't
merely an annoyance.

The charges are narrow in scope - related to his personal life
and cover-ups of such things.

The report probably focused mainly on Monica Lewinsky, but it
wouldn't be surprising if incidents from the Paula Jones suit
were also mentioned.

Starr's staff decided not too long ago to concentrate on these
limited matters in the Congressional version.

There are also other women and other cases of obstruction of
justice, mainly involving the moving of these people to cushy
jobs. Most of the jobs were in the Department of Defense and
the Pentagon, but others were with Hollywood firms. The
intention was for these women to become inaccessible.

In one instance, a source says, a woman's record was
expunged from the Pentagon's files to cover up her transfer.

By limiting the scope of the report to these things, it leaves
Clinton legally vulnerable to a lot of crimes that aren't going to
be revealed to Congress.

As if all this weren't enough:

Starr is working on a second report to the three judges who
oversee his probe. The charges in the judges' report won't be
as titillating, but they will make Clinton vulnerable to prosecution
should he leave office.

Charges to the judges will include racketeering, a legal term
that means a series of crimes committed in an organized
fashion. Since this statute is usually applied to mobsters, it will
be shocking to the public and harmful to Clinton.

There are stories of sexual oddities in the report that was sent
to Congress, some of which haven't yet surfaced. As much as
the Republicans might be inclined to get this impeachment
process over with, the temptation to embarrass Clinton and the
Democrats as much as possible will be too great.

All of this is a formula for a long, protracted period of tension
for America and for an already nervous stock market.



To: Zoltan! who wrote (59)9/10/1998 1:39:00 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 567
 
Interesting report. Thanks for posting it.

GZ