Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (5536)	9/10/1998 10:17:00 AM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 86076

>>when<< Yes it will, but that is the question. I might part company from some of the ultra-bears here. I think the down cycle could be shorter this time around -- maybe only 1 1/2 to 2 years. ^BKX -- the "BK index" down over 4%! New lower low today.

To: MythMan who wrote (5536)	9/10/1998 10:20:00 AM
From: Defrocked	Respond to of 86076

RE: "Would you invest in a co where ceo is on the run?" Obviously not as reflected in today's dollar and gold trades. And Tuesday's equity heros are now zeros with a "I shoulda sold instead" mentality.

To: MythMan who wrote (5536)	9/10/1998 10:33:00 AM
From: Tom M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

Hey Pete you forgot earnings warnings & Y2K disclosure on 3Q reports. Anyone have a link to info as to the SEC is requiring companies to disclose their known Y2K impact in the 3Q reports? I had read that somewhere months ago & haven't seen if they made it a requirement. Even companies that make their earnings may be taken out and shot on earnings announcement if they have to announce large Y2K costs. regards, Tom [Edit] BTW, Brazil & Mexico are looking real ugly right now, as well as the New Lows already today