Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (4424)	9/10/1998 10:53:00 AM
From: Impristine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

<<<All this discussion has been refreshing, have to get back to work.>>> ===== yes, it is very kind of you to take time out of your busy day....god bless you....my friend...<G>

To: j g cordes who wrote (4424)	9/10/1998 10:53:00 AM
From: j_b	Respond to of 13994

<<Just wondering j b.. how much legal effort should be applied to bringing charges against grand jury leaks? I'm sure you don't believe the end justifies the means..>> Once again, we agree. The amount of effort needs to be related to the amount of damage or potential damage. IMHO, no damage was done. If the people in charge of deciding how much effort to use feel otherwise, it's their decision. I would have no problem either way. If the ends/means issue you were referring to was the actual leaking - I still don't see how leaks would have helped Starr, so I tend to think the leaks did not come from his office. However, Clinton stood to gain greatly from the leaks, both by using them to portray the issue as related to sex, and to accuse Starr of leaking info. Regardless of which side leaked info, I don't feel it should have happened.