SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zoltan! who wrote (4616)9/10/1998 5:06:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
AMERICA NEEDS A TAX CUT ..

By DICK MORRIS

Clinton hasn't done much this yearto deserve two more years in
office.A tax cut - coupled with some money for child care and
Medicare - would do a lot to show the public that he still knows
the job and is capable of leadership. The Republicans in
Congress have had a year of similar inactivity. They could put a
strong finish on their lackluster congressional session witha
September tax cut. WITH the recent harrowing dive of the stock
market, nothing could be clearer than that the international
economic situation is precarious. With a recession in Japan,
currency instability in Asia and chaos in Russia, the United
States economy needs a high and continued level of domestic
demand to make it through the global turmoil and pull the rest of
the world out of recession. Obviously, a cut in interest rates is
called for. But the recent advent of a balanced federal budget
makes it possible to bring the other part of the Keynesian
two-step into play - fiscal policy. With a $63-billion surplus
estimated for the fiscal year that ends this month, it makes
sense to cut taxes and to cut them now.

What makes economic sense for America also makes political
sense for Clinton and the Republican Congress. Clinton hasn't
done much this year to deserve two more years in office. A tax
cut - coupled with some money for child care and Medicare -
would do a lot to show the public that he still knows the job and
is capable of leadership.

The Republicans in Congress have had a year of similar
inactivity. They could put a strong finish on their lackluster
congressional session with a September tax cut.

Congressional Democrats won't like a tax cut: They never met
a tax they didn't like, and they are loath of concede any
accomplishment to the GOP. So Clinton may worry about
alienating his own party as he faces the possibility of
impeachment in the House. It all boils down to whether it is
better to be loved or feared. Machiavelli had it right. It is better
to be feared. Clinton needs high poll ratings to protect him from
impeachment a whole lot more than he needs love and
affection from the Democrats.

Remember that few congressional Democrats would weep if
Clinton were to resign and let a squeaky-clean Al Gore take the
party into the 2000 election as president. And remember that
the Republicans need Clinton to serve out his term so they
don't have to run against an incumbent in 2000. If Clinton
leaves office before his time and gives Gore the advantage of
a two-year incumbency, the Democratic Party will likely control
the White House until 2008, the longest Democratic tenure
since FDR and Truman controlled the Presidency from
1933-1952.

The GOP needs something to take the country's mind off
impeachment as the 1998 election nears. The last thing the
Republicans need is to face the constant question: Do you
want to impeach a president who two-thirds of the country
thinks is doing a good job? If the Republicans could bring
home to their constituency a real live tax cut, the importance of
voting Republican for Congress will be readily apparent.

So what is good for America is good for Clinton and is good
for the Republicans.

While Clinton is at it, he should put the GOP on the spot and
send up a tobacco bill without any tax increase.

Polls show that the public buys the cigarette-company line that
a tax hike on cigarettes would hurt working people. Americans
regard taxation as the least effective strategy in controlling
tobacco use by teen-agers. If kids can afford designer Nike
sneakers, they can afford a dollar a pack more for tobacco. But
the public strongly favors Food and Drug Administration
regulation of tobacco and all the marketing and advertising
restrictions that Clinton wants.

If the president takes out the tax provisions (which were
inserted by knee-jerk liberals at Donna Shalala's Department
of Health and Human Services), he will have a popular bill. He
should send such a bill up to Congress and dare the
Republicans to reject it. By framing the tobacco choice so
starkly, he will likely get a tobacco bill that he can trumpet as
another achievement.

And he should take every sucess he can get. If he wants to
avoid becoming the second president to be dishonored by
being forced out of office, he needs a record to take into the
next two years. And to resist the argument that scandal has
made it impossible for him to serve effectively in the White
House, he has to show that he can still get bills passed. Clinton
isn't going to get much passed in 1999, as he seeks to wedge
accomplishments in between impeachment hearings. Once the
1998 elections are over, the Republicans will not pass anything
he wants. They will be gearing up for the 2000 elections and
will resist giving Clinton anything to pass on to Gore as a
legacy except for scandal and possible impeachment. They will
treat his State of the Union speech in January 1999 as dead on
arrival.

So, functionally, this month is the last time he'll be able to get
anything of consequence passed in his presidency. If Clinton is
to lay in a record for the next two years, he'd better do it this
month.

And he can get both a tax cut and a tobacco bill - if he goes for
it.

Ask George Bush what America thinks of a president who
faces an economic downturn and sits on his hands. A bold call
for a tax cut and an effective display of presidential resolve in
getting it passed will arm him with an accomplishment that can
keep him going over the next two years.



To: Zoltan! who wrote (4616)9/11/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: lorrie coey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
...there won't be a sweep!



To: Zoltan! who wrote (4616)9/11/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: P.T.Burnem  Respond to of 13994
 
Says Dem pols would love for Slick to resign while Reps would love to see him stick around.

IMO, neither party can control the runaway impeachment train.

For most congresscritters, the choice is between jumping on the bandwagon, and laying on the tracks pretending that there is a light in the end of the tunnel.

PTB