SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Patriot Scientific - PTSC -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Urlman who wrote (5486)9/10/1998 6:04:00 PM
From: bob  Respond to of 8581
 
Urlman,

Looks as though we will need Benedict Arnold to sort this all
out. Isd seems to have tested a pico design (seems to be from
LG Semicon) as well as others. Doesn't seem to come to any
conclusions as to the ultimate functionality of the systems
tested. Wonder if there is any more info to be had with regards to
this. Obviously, the picoJava design has yet to be produced. Wonder
if they ever will, and wonder if this testing concludes that the
chip performs well. Also have to wonder at what price point this
chip can be produced. Lots of questions.

Cap



To: Urlman who wrote (5486)9/10/1998 9:21:00 PM
From: cksla  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8581
 
urlman-

i would assume "the 32 bit PicoJava processor" must refer to LG's and not Advancel's since LG is co-developing the picojava processor with Sun and i can't imagine Sun letting its trademark be tarnished. I note the article refers to it as 66mhz. i wonder if that's still the case; if so we shouldn't we have it beat w/ our 100mhz soon to be 150mhz. ...bob


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News