Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: andrew peterson who wrote (3828)	9/10/1998 6:43:00 PM
From: Pure Folder	Respond to of 11417

No, the real problem with DocStone is not whether he buys or sells WAVX--I could care less. It has more to do with msc123, the colleague of his with whom he has telephone discussions, and the one whose rumors DocStone so fully endorses. See, for msc123 to quite recently publish another I-have-the-inside-scoop rumor--and to have never withdrawn it--and for DocStone now to fold on WAVX seems particularly suspicious to me. Does he not believe msc123? Do he and msc123 have new information they are not sharing, leaving the former rumor out there for the gullible? Buy on the rumor and sell on the news, says DocStone. If there is no rumor, make it up, right? And if they don't buy it, then move on to something else. Pure Folder

To: andrew peterson who wrote (3828)	9/10/1998 6:58:00 PM
From: M. Frank Greiffenstein	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11417

Like Abe Lincoln said... Andrew, I don't take your hostile comments personally. I take it as an expression of your frustration. It is impossible to satisfy people. In times past when I sold or lost interest in tracking a stock and "stuck around for the conversation", I was slammed for "piling on", gloating etc, "leave us alone" yada yada. Now I leave after deciding WAVX is not for me, and I am called a chicken. LOL, I am glad I don't base my decisions on the whims and fleeting emotions of others. Besides, Andrew, you remarks have no relation to reality. I have been out of WAVX since the mosnter rally in Spring. I have definitely been sticking aorund for the ocnversation, so I have no idea what you are talking about. Not sure what is "inflammatory" about forming an opinion that WAVX concept while good, is impractical. I have always held this doubt and expressed it on this board, but my doubts have more recently solidified into outright negativism. I guess when you say inflammatory you really mean an opinion different than yours. If you really were that confident about WAVX, you wouldn't act so defensive and brittle. Again, let me wish luck to my friends here like Marty, Jas, Wildman and others. Maybe WAVX can pull it off. But maybe is not good enough. Better to bet on concrete Internet infrastructure plays like GBLX, IFCI and CSCO. DocStone