Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: victor pan who wrote (52142)	9/10/1998 9:46:00 PM
From: MonsieurGonzo	Respond to of 58727

Victor; RE:" Sew Waves " >Looks like some interesting "waves." are these the so-called Elliot waves ? ...no, Victor - those are the *Sew Waves* (^_^) I've already been taken to task for calling Don's calls "waves", as everybody thinks Elliott Waves. Whatever - I visualize them as waves. >however, it seems that one can come up with the "waves" with just about any moving average... maybe some fourier analysis can give better "forecast" than the moving averages ? ...I tried that, Victor - IMHO, the "cycles" themselves are not time-based, but sentiment-based; ie., the spectrum (or autocorrelation) only remains valid for some indeterminate time, and then changes. Easy enough to see them, however, and after a while, you (think) you can "feel" them. Donald's analyses tend to bolster my personal confidence as to what I see and feel. I also use the candlesticks, traditional TrendLines, and fibonacci. >how do you come up with 216 and 78 ? [intra-day time candlesticks] 78 minutes is 1/5 of a 390 minute trading session, so each day becomes 5 candlesticks: 5x78m=DAY 5xDAY=WEEK. 216m is a "magic" number - go see the film, "pi" (^_^) -Steve