SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GerryMiles who wrote (3834)9/10/1998 11:15:00 PM
From: webinfopro.com  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11417
 
Wouldn't it be nice if the IRS could use the meter to raise the money Starr spent by getting us to pay to see the report? Talk about making a profit off of content.......Oh well, maybe for the next big political scandal.

Weby



To: GerryMiles who wrote (3834)9/11/1998 12:18:00 AM
From: Tony McFadden  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11417
 
Gerry, you worry me.

Either you are scamming the entire board [not like that hasn't happened before] and are a pathological liar, or you are privy to inside info that by rights shouldn't be shared until it's public.

We'll know tomorrow.

T.



To: GerryMiles who wrote (3834)9/11/1998 3:36:00 PM
From: Marty Lee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11417
 
Gerry,

I've got a file of a poster of Disney Characters doing all kinds of nasty, xxx rated stuff. <VBG> I don't intend to wave enable it as I don't want to be sued! Nevertheless, I've spoken with Steven Sprague about the wave enabling of the xxx world and he said it's certainly not out of the question. Disney does not have to "dirty" its image by placing its content alongside Debbie's. Wave Systems can accommodate both worlds with separate SMO's which can be placed anyplace on the Net and far enough apart to avoid any association. WaveNet, our central accounting and processing system, will handle all the transactions quite nicely regardless of their moral differences. It's all 0's and 1's to me.....

Yours,
Marty



To: GerryMiles who wrote (3834)9/11/1998 5:05:00 PM
From: andrew peterson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11417
 
<<...but remember i didnt say am or pm.>>

Well, Gerry, I guess you were right. The announcement didn't come either in the am or in the pm. Care to comment?