Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riley G who wrote (52231)	9/11/1998 4:45:00 AM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

"A Special Message from Riley G to All Shareholders ----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 From: Riley G Since the halt and none trading of RMIL, when and how did Morgan and Breton give (issue) themselves the 4 million shares of RMIL (over 4 million dollars based upon the last legal trade on Dec. 21, 1997)? The break down is 2 million to Morgan, and 2 Million to Breton. What were these shares for, and where is the proper SEC filings for those transactions? Also Morgan and Breton have paid themselves 750,000 shares between the two of them. Based upon the last trade of $1.0625, that comes to $796,875 for a non-trading security. I was told that this was SALARY for year. If that's the case then how do they claim to not being paid, and what are the extra issued 4 million shares for? I'll tell you what they are for, they appear to have been issued to Gary and Roland so they can have control of RMIL. Also what about the original 2 million shares of S8 for employee (1997 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN)? re: sec.gov Those shares appear to be in the market already! So that means that the employees received said compensation there also! " Here,Here, Riley, I am impressed (honestly). Got to run..DD

To: Riley G who wrote (52231)	9/11/1998 4:49:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 55532

riley, if mork OWNS the company, what happens to your cartel and all shareholders? oh, and please define soon. 2, 3, 4... decades? ;-)

To: Riley G who wrote (52231)	9/11/1998 5:06:00 AM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

See what happens when the person in the front leading the fight gets PO'd at the Company. I am for the shareholders of RMIL, and the shareholders only! RG PS. I am every more disgusted at the nays and admitted shorts!

To: Riley G who wrote (52231)	9/20/1998 2:07:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Riley, Too bad you didn't get PO'd enough back last fall when you had evidence that managements misrepresentations were undermining the safety of your investment. Had you gone at that time, told the company to come clean with regards to its financials and such, you still would have had the short squeeze (maybe..). But in exchange, you probably would not have had a company who provided the necessary pretext for the SEC to halt the trading of its stock. Unfortunately, AZNT appears to be a complete repeat of the RMIL scenario. Too bad shareholders of that stock don't have the common sense or the cajones to DEMAND (on threat of selling their positions), that the company come into immediate compliance at all levels. That most likely all it would have taken Riley, and I think you know this. Regards, Ron