To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (4493 ) 9/11/1998 10:59:00 AM From: Hoatzin Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12810
My dear Blinker, It was remiss of me not to acknowledge the difficulties of "foreign language" composition, which you so bravely attack head on. I know I could not come close to your level of accomplishment in any language other than my native tongue. I apologize for mocking your linguistic efforts, and this should not really have been a "moron" nomination. But the comic contrast between the big build up of the "great formula" to increase one's winning percentage, and the final PS ("Sorry Folk's- So far the whole concept stinks." ) really did make me laugh a lot. I hope it was deliberate! Here is a sincere suggestion: I don't think the opacity of your output will be removed by dictionaries, or "editing facilities and proof reader attached." You seem to aim for a high style and level of language that is very difficult to perfect. And if it is not perfectly done, the effect is sometimes comical. I humbly recommend a "KISS" (Keep It Simple) approach to your writing. I recall that German speakers/writers/readers are accustomed to quite complex sentence structures, with agreements of case, person and gender spanning hundreds of words before the final blessed relief of a period. :-) Think about your audience on the internet. Busy people with many windows open on their screens, bouncing between e-mail, phone calls, three or four "real work" tasks, plus a quote screen and SI. Busy people with short attention spans who expect complex technical proposals to be condensed into a Powerpoint presentation of five bullets a page, no more than seven pages! Here's a post (picked at random) that I just know I don't want to read: #reply-5721882 Here's a person who almost always makes his point in two lines or less: #reply-5716579 There are many "style books" that may be helpful to you. I happen to like "The Elements of Business Writing" by Blake and Bly. Kevin