To: BlueFox who wrote (13781 ) 9/11/1998 9:48:00 AM From: Jon Tara Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18444
FLash! ONE MYSTERY SOLVED! BlueFox, I am apparently also engaged in a work in progress! All of my domains have also been updated, as have those of all of my ISPs! All that work in progress!!! PT has missed an important distinction: here are the dates from one of my domain records: Record last updated on 05-Jan-97. Record created on 17-Jul-95. Database last updated on 11-Sep-98 04:06:54 EDT. The DATABASE was last updated on 11-Sep-98. Not MY RECORD, but the DATABASE. The DATABASE of domain names, NOT the RECORD for my domain. Letsee, could it be? Let's take a look at the dates from the sesame-ad.com record: Record last updated on 21-Oct-97. Record created on 16-Jul-97. Database last updated on 11-Sep-98 04:06:54 EDT. Yup. The sasame-ad.com record was last updated on October 27, 1997, NOT Sept 98, 1998. Do I have to explain to PT the difference between a database and a record? I'll bet he knows that much about a database already, though. This is yet another example of PT, true to his family motto, "embellishing the truth". What he is saying is absolutely untrue. The database record of sesame-ad.com was NOT updated. The database that holds it was. That means that at least one record in the database was updated. Internic does this on a schedule, several times a week. BTW, let me know when it goes longer than a week without that date being updated. THAT would be news, and I'd advise selling all of your Internet stocks at that point. :) PT owes me an apology. Two, actually. He knows what the second one is. PT, you are either a liar or mistaken. I know you won't admit to being a liar, so at least have the honor to admit to being mistaken. Everybody else can now argue about this. For me, I have caught PT in a fabrication, and there is no point in arguing about this further.