Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Loki who wrote (32744)	9/11/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: Eddie Kim	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

**OT** You're right...just expressing my opinion. I think however, that Starr has some thing up his sleeve. I read somewhere, "Starr's silence is one of power..not of weakness."

To: Loki who wrote (32744)	9/11/1998 12:34:00 PM
From: C E D	Respond to of 97611

Under the spirit of American law.... Shouldn't Americans usually wait until the evidence has been submitted...even if they are almost certain of the contents? The president shouldn't be held above the law, neither should he be held below the law. In any criminal case there would be a discovery process where the accused gets to see the evidence against them to prepare to answer the charges, to investigate inaccuracies etc. This head long rush to punish Clinton with the charges is unbecoming to America, its justice system and its people. What future president will be able to withstand a five year 40 million dollar investigation? All this over a land deal where the Clintons lost $40K. There is a sunset provision in the special prosecutor law and I can assure you the republicans will not renew the law as it is, no one will want to be subject to the unrestrained power of the a special prosecutor again. JMO, Ed