SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Loki who wrote (32761)9/11/1998 1:10:00 PM
From: rupert1  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 97611
 
Loki: I have travelled to many places in the world representing
American companies and have also been embarrassed by news
concerning Clinton.


Why, are you in the Starr Bible Report?

Victor



To: Loki who wrote (32761)9/11/1998 1:12:00 PM
From: Dr. Id  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 

I strongly believe that the voters should have taken George Bush
very seriously when he said, in 1992, "It is the character of the
President that matters".


That may be true. Unfortunately, in '92 we were not presented with a candidate who had strong character. Clinton has Paula Jones and Monica, Bush had the Panama Invasion and the business deals with the Kuwaitees after the Gulf War. I would choose the guy who had illicit sex over the one who killed innocent civilians with a political agenda and then financially profited by it.

JB



To: Loki who wrote (32761)9/11/1998 2:12:00 PM
From: CGarcia  Respond to of 97611
 
"I strongly believe that the voters should have taken George Bush
very seriously when he said, in 1992, "It is the character of the
President that matters".

I agree, maybe that's why when Bush was asked about HIS mistress, and he walked off the interview, voters took notice ;)