Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (4889)	9/11/1998 4:15:00 PM
From: mauser96	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

I'm a bit puzzled. Is it alright to perjure if it's about sex, but not alright to perjure if it's about shoplifting or burglary? Everybody should have the right to self determine if the law applies to them? What about his testimony about not remembering being alone with her. This wasn't a question about sex. Being alone with someone is neither immoral or illegal, and doesn't imply any "improper relationship". Let's face it, his answer was a 100% lie. How can anyone deny that he lied to the court? I understand from some first info in the Starr report that there was direct genital to genital contact in one case. This isn't in your definition of sex? There wasn't any penetration, so maybe it's not smoking pot if you don't inhale., and it's not sex if you don't penetrate.<<g>>