SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (4908)9/11/1998 4:39:00 PM
From: Brad Bolen  Respond to of 13994
 
Michelle,

Maybe this will expain...

STARR:

"From the outset, it was our strong desire to complete all phases of the investigation before deciding whether to submit to Congress
information -- if any -- that may constitute grounds for an impeachment. But events and the statutory command of Section 595(c)
have dictated otherwise. As the investigation into the President's actions with respect to Ms. Lewinsky and the Jones litigation
progressed, it became apparent that there was a significant body of substantial and credible information that met the Section 595(c)
threshold. As that phase of the investigation neared completion, it also became apparent that a delay of this Referral until the
evidence from all phases of the investigation had been evaluated would be unwise"

So, this is his excuse for leaving out Whitewater?

B.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (4908)9/11/1998 5:15:00 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Exactly, Michelle.

The Starr "Sex Report" makes for a good read but little else....the Pres' lawyers just gave that same opinion to reporters on T.V.

Monica certainly is a giving person, isn't she:o)

D'ya feel the public will respond with disgust for Starr or outrage towards Pres. Clinton?

Ann