SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paunch who wrote (34137)9/11/1998 8:19:00 PM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Before I talk with Paunch, a message from me to Charters and anyone
else recommonding that the new money be used into other dirt ventures
that would be saner and safer than the IPM route to Black Rock.
(1) Message received and understood by this thread.
(2) As of this date, from the active ipmcf shareholders, espically
those that have taken an active role for months now, them being
Paunch, Chuck, Robert, Alley and John, these people are the ones
at the ONLY controls trying to save Black Rock dirt investment, and
as the first words of this sentence implies that you already know
what interest has been taken, and that is NO NO NO interest.
(3) So, Charters et al, we have strong reasons, beside not trusting
you, to strongly not go into another dirt venture, as you outline.
Even if we did trust you 100%, you are missing the substance of what
we are doing. So, please get lost, or get lost, or go to hell, please.
(4)If there are any ipmcf shareholders, past or curent, that feel that
what Charters is recommonding with the new money angle will bear fruit
and obtain you money, to cover any ipmcf losses, then I will simply
say that this is OFF TOPIC, and take it elsewhere, like in private
posts or e-mail to Charters. New money used for IPM continuation with
the Black Rock dirt attached, done by current ipmcf shareholders is
the topic and this is the ipmcf thread. As far as I'am concered, to
let IPM go into chapter 7 with no ipmcf shareholder buyout, and the
highest bidder get the dirt, and IPM and ipmcf shares no longer exist,
then I am out of the picture. For me, its continue IPM with the
Black Rock dirt as the "soul" of the company, and someday get back
onto an exchange for trading. For me, a continuation of IPM with
the original dream of riches in the Black Rock dirt, AND the continuation
of this thread. And a BIG reason I want the continuation of IPM is
because we the current shareholders, with those active ones mentioned,
will control the company. And if the Black Rock dirt is good dirt,
then with these people we know in charge, I see success guaranteed
just so the price of gold does not drop lower for the next years.
And I have another reason, that I am sure is shared with many, and that
is not only will it feel good to save our investment, but the feeling
to save the IPM Company will also be great, as if after 33,000 posts,
there is an connection made in spirit. Also, how many times in a persons
life do one that values good over bad and evil, does one have a change
to win the fight. Also, not for me, but there are people that have
the thought implanted in their brains at birth, as to them reconizing
that they have the ability to take control and lead, as in directors
of a company. These are the types you want to oversee your money.
Not those that want power or feel they have the education, as prime
reasons. So, Charters, no more off-topic please.
(5) all done, now to Paunch
Paunch, I do not know what role or influence John Yellich had in the
chapter 11 for IPM, but if he can help us continue IPM, and we need
his type of skills, then I see no reason not to ask and let him be
part of this as in being CEO or President or whatever the title is
that will describe the type of work he will do. All we need to know
is that he will not behind our backs try to make IPM fail. Period.
As for Chuca's experience talking with him a month ago, put a person
in a corner with people saying bad things about him, wanting to tar
and feather the person, looking for evidence to show and prove that
he is a bad person that done wrong. Walk up to this person and he
will look at you as if you are a threat, and if you ask he any question,
he knows that eventho you are asking simple things, this person does
not trust you and wants to punish you. So, John Yellich found it hard
to talk and give out information to current shareholders that are trying
to find guilt and punish those that wronged IPM, and John Yellich is
on the list of possible bad people. The fact that he actually talked
as much as he did surprises me. Think yourself in a dark alley in
new york city by yourself and a bunch of street thugs approach you
and ask you questions, you will feel fear and talk only under a heavy
weight of pressure and non trust.
Enough.
For myself, I want to restate a simple sentence I wrote above.
My new money is to continue the IPM Company with the Black Rock dirt.
No buy out paying the debt, and only bid for the dirt does not interest
me any more. If I cannot see IPM continue and get back onto an
exchange after proving the dirt and price of gold goes up, and
continue posting on this thread, then my interest is lost.
Doug



To: Paunch who wrote (34137)9/11/1998 9:18:00 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
I have never lied to you.

Everything I have said on this thread is my sincere belief.

I am widely known among my associates as an honest trustworthy professional.

I offered you a credible alternative to the grief of trying to resurrect an uncertain property with substantial debt.

Gold is rising dramatically in price with strong market forces.

You may be throwing good money after bad by trying to take on a research project that will take an enormous effort to get industry belief and it it turns out to be unworkable or worse not repeatable at all, it will be a long time and many dollars down the drain. And all this for a second time.

The existence of conventional properties that could be tackled with project economics already demonstrated has to be of interest to resource investors.

I hope I don't sound like I am trying to lead you down any garden path here.

E. Charters

mailto:echarter@vianet.on.ca



To: Paunch who wrote (34137)9/11/1998 10:00:00 PM
From: Tim Hall  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
<< Sorry to say but I couldn't trust you any further than I could through you.>>

Paunch, I'm trying to help you here, I think you met throw you.

Tim