SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (20356)9/11/1998 7:10:00 PM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
Executive summary-
To: House Judiciary Committee, the Honorable Henry Hyde, Chairman

Our office has been charged by the attorney general with the grave responsibility of determining if there has been any criminal wrongdoing by the president of the United States or those acting at his direction.
The most serious of the issues we have examined is the alleged cover-up of the sexual affair between a White House intern, Monica Lewinsky, then 21, and the president of the United States--a man old enough to be her father--in or near the Oval Office between November 1995 and December 1997. This case is not about sex but about possible criminal conduct by President Bill Clinton in violation of his oath of office and the laws of this nation, including perjury, subornation of perjury, and obstruction of justice.
A review of the relevant criminal violations is in order for a proper judgment to be rendered by your committee.

I. PERJURY
The details of the illicit sexual contacts between President Clinton and Ms. Lewinsky contradict the president's sworn testimony in Jones vs. Clinton and before the grand jury, despite the president's claims that his statements were "legally accurate." Herein are highlights of our findings (see Appendix XX for a complete list and descriptions of sexual acts, including oral copulation, mutual masturbation, and lewd and lascivious conduct with a cylindrical smoking device in violation of D.C. criminal code statute 531.6b).
According to the testimony of Ms. Lewinsky, the first of 49 sexual contacts between the president and herself began Nov. 15, 1995 (Lewinsky testimony, Part I, Pages 12-18). Lewinsky testified that as an intern in the West Wing she was summoned to deliver food to the president and was so observed entering the Oval Office at 11:59 p.m. by members of the uniformed Secret Service detail (Officer Lewis Fox testimony, Pages 5-12).
"Pizza, Mr. President?" Monica Lewinsky cooed, hoisting a large box of Domino's above her stylish dark tresses, according to the testimony of Lewinsky and Officer Fox. The raven-haired beauty, her voluptuous curves thrusting against the tight fabric of a low-cut white dress, stood outside the door of the Oval Office near midnight, a come-hither look in her flashing, dark eyes. "I'd love some," the president drawled, his eyes widening with desire, "but let me finish up here talking about highway appropriations with Sen. Lott." He winked broadly, then gave her a wide, rakish smile that lit her soul with excitement. She was alone at last with the president! (Lewinsky I, Pages 27-42).
Lewinsky has stated that ever since arriving in June 1995, the brilliant young intern, known both for her shapely body and a powerful intelligence that would make her an asset in any high-paying corporate PR job (contact: Plato Cacheris, [202] 555-9432), looked for ways to attract the attention of Bill Clinton. He was tall, charismatic, with piercing blue eyes that made Monica weak inside--and, best of all, he was the most powerful man on Earth! Now he put down the phone and looked at her--and the pizza--with undisguised hunger. "You look as hot as that pie, darlin'," he said, glancing at the cleavage of her firm, young breasts, while her breath quickened with expectation. "I've seen you around before, haven't I? What's your name again?"
"Monica," she said, her voice husky with longing. "Monica Lewinsky" (Exhibit A, "Lewinsky diary," Page 45).
"Well, Monica honey, I think it's snack time," the president said with a sexy growl in his voice. [...] He guided her into an adjoining study, holding a slice of pizza in his free hand, and said, in the warm, caring way she'd always admired, "I need someone like you in times like these."
With an unleashed passion that took her breath away, he suddenly grabbed, through her sheer dress, the firm yet pliant flesh of her buttocks, causing Monica to shiver with excitement, and then urgently kissed her, his tongue teasing hers, Lewinsky stated to the grand jury. "You really turn me on, Monica," he said in a hoarse, breathless whisper. "A chief of state has needs, sweetie pie, just like any other man," he added, putting his hand gently on the back of Monica's luxuriant dark hair, guiding her down to his fiery loins. Her face beamed with adoration as she explored his body, her tongue licking him slowly as she moved ever closer to his sword of love (Lewinsky, Pages 12-24; see also Linda Tripp tape transcripts, Pages 11-34).
She enveloped his throbbing manhood, and the muscles in his thighs contracted while he moaned softly with pleasure, Lewinsky testified. "You're fantastic, Monica baby," he gasped. "I wish Hillary knew how to treat me like you do." [...] Suddenly, the president of the United States exploded in shuddering bursts of joy. After they hugged each other, Monica aglow in her newfound love, the president whispered to her, "You're special to me, Monica, but let's keep this our little secret" (Lewinsky diary, Page 52; Tripp tapes, Page 35). He reached for the still-warm pizza with a satisfied smirk. "Seems like I'm always hungry, Monica," he said. She understood exactly how he felt.


FBI analysis of the DNA found on a cocktail dress owned by Ms. Lewinsky corroborates another key sexual encounter and thus contradicts the president's sworn deposition on Jan. 17 that he could not recall meeting alone with Ms. Lewinsky (cf, "FBI lab findings, Aug. 10, 1998, re 'love juice' " Pages 5-9; Clinton deposition, Pages 52, 92, et al.).
Item: On Easter Sunday, April 7, 1996, the president returned from church after services eulogizing Commerce Secretary Ron Brown. White House phone logs for that date show that he placed a phone call to the Lewinsky residence at 11:20 a.m. He apparently felt the familiar longing that only the beautiful and vivacious Monica Lewinsky could satisfy (Lewinsky testimony, Part II, Page 161). He would do (or say) anything to have her, even if it meant breaking the law--or a young woman's heart (testimony of Dick Morris, Page 32; Lewinsky II, Page 191.) That morning, wondering if he really loved her, she was lounging in her black silk pajamas, her ripe breasts exposed, waiting for his call. "Monica, I want you with me all the time," he told her, and that's all she needed to hear. [...] She was wearing a sexy blue cocktail dress when she was ushered into the Oval Office alone (testimony of Confidential Informant No. 12, code named "Manolo"), and the president gazed at her with a wild, hungry passion (Lewinsky diary, Page 136).
"Honey, I want to see all of you ... naked," he begged. [...]
Climbing on a desk in the secluded study, she wriggled her luscious hips, and slowly began peeling off her dress, shaking her huge breasts free so he could see--and touch--them in all their alabaster glory. She trembled as he caressed her, and she moved with new, intense passion as she saw him arouse himself, his face distorted in a mask of sheer lust. "Oh, my God, Monica, you turn me on more than any woman I've ever known," he exclaimed in between rapid pants of excitement. "I want to marry you after I leave the White House and leave Hillary far, far behind." With that, Monica exultantly threw the dress down at his feet as the president groaned in ecstasy and release, leaving traces of his love on her dress, a memento of the passion they shared together (Tripp tapes, Pages 124-192; Tripp testimony, Pages 36-43; Lewinsky I, Page 67).
Monica never imagined that the dress she treasured would someday be used to help convince publishers that her exclusive story of their steamy love affair, complete with shocking new details, was well worth $10 million or more, foreign rights included.


In his Jan. 17, 1998, deposition, the president said he couldn't recall the specifics of most gifts Lewinsky gave him, and yet he strongly denied receiving a silver cigar box from Lewinsky (Clinton deposition, Page 54). But a reported sexual encounter between Ms. Lewinsky and Mr. Clinton challenges the president's veracity under oath on this matter. Our office has received compelling evidence that Lewinsky not only gave the president the box, but Ms. Lewinsky conspired with the president to use at least one (1) cigar from the box to perform a lewd and lascivious act in violation of a Washington, D.C., criminal statute (Lewinsky testimony I, Pages 121-184; Exhibit C, Nieman-Marcus receipt, Oct. 1, 1996 ; The Drudge Report, Aug. 22, 1998; D.C. statute 531.6b).
Item: On Oct. 16, 1996, Lewinsky visited the president at the White House, according to White House visitor logs and Lewinsky's sworn statements, where she asked the president if he would ever be willing to declare their romance to the world. In response, the president handed her a velvet box with a silver ring inside. "Our love is important to me," he told her. Her heart filled with an overpowering love for him, but she was puzzled when he leered, "It matches the silver of the cigar box." He reached into the silver humidor and took out a clear-wrapped El Tempo, and gave her a big grin. "You can't commit adultery with a cigar, right?" (Lewinsky I, Pages 155-170).
She wondered again whether he cared for her as a person, or just as a sex object to service his sickest desires. She was shocked to realize that it didn't matter, really, as long as she got to be with him now--and forever (Lewinsky diary, Pages 92-93). "Hand me that cigar, big boy," she said, hoisting up her skirt, wallowing in all the depravity he taught her, "and let's see if we can light your fire!" Soon she was squirming on top of the blue carpet's presidential seal, moaning, "Oh, Mr. President!" while his cauldron of lust came to a boil--and then overflowed, Lewinsky stated (Lewinsky I, Pages 175-179). They were both plunged into a crazed maelstrom of feverish ecstasy, and afterward he asked her a special favor. "Darlin', if you're ever called to testify about our relationship, don't ever lie."
"I promise, Mr. President."
He added with a cackle, "But just don't volunteer any extra information!" He was so brazen sometimes, she couldn't help but love him (Lewinsky I, Pages 180-186; Tripp tapes, Pages 211-212).
The criminal pattern of subornation of perjury and obstruction of justice (see Sections II and III, below) was built on this bedrock of lies and sexual misconduct. We hope your committee will take appropriate action in response to the enclosed material.
Slate



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (20356)9/11/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
Frame Game -The Starr Report -By William Saletan

Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr has submitted his report to Congress. If early briefings provided to the New York Times and Washington Post are correct and complete, it's highly unlikely that Congress will impeach President Clinton. Here are the charges and their respective weight in the impeachment calculus.

1) Perjuring in the Paula Jones deposition. Clinton denied having "sexual relations" with Lewinsky and said he didn't recall ever being alone with her in the White House.

Prognosis: Conclusively proved but not fatal, because 1) Congress already knows Clinton lied and 2) enough members of Congress will agree that the lies were about adultery--not about official duties--and were motivated by natural embarrassment.

2) Perjuring before the grand jury Aug. 17. Clinton testified that he had engaged in "inappropriate intimate physical contact" with Lewinsky but maintained that their contact did not meet the Jones lawyers' definition of "sexual relations."

Prognosis: Proved in letter but not in spirit. Clinton essentially confirmed to the grand jury, and again on television that night, that he had messed around with Lewinsky. His denial that this constituted "sexual relations" is unpersuasive hairsplitting. But so is Starr's charge that such a hairsplitting denial, in the midst of an essential confession, constitutes perjury.

3) Coaching Betty Currie. The report says after testifying in January, Clinton asked Currie questions calculated to influence her potential testimony about Lewinsky.

Prognosis: This could be fatal to Clinton, if proved, since Congress won't tolerate the president bullying an innocent third party into a cover-up. But Currie's testimony has evidently failed to clarify the intent of the conversation sufficiently. If it remains a matter of subtle interpretation, Congress won't have the confidence to impeach Clinton over it.

4) Getting Lewinsky a job. The report says Clinton enlisted Vernon Jordan to get Lewinsky a nice private sector job in order to shut her up.

Prognosis: This was the charge that was supposed to justify the whole investigation and link it to other Clinton scandals. The theory was that Clinton and Jordan had conspired to get former Assistant Attorney General Web Hubbell lucrative private sector contracts in order to shut him up about Whitewater, and they were pulling the same stunt with Lewinsky. But Starr's report allegedly portrays Jordan as Clinton's innocent dupe in the Lewinsky job hunt, which kills the larger theory and thus the likelihood that this line of attack will lead to impeachment.

5) Hiding the gifts. Lewinsky says Clinton told her she didn't have to turn over to Jones' lawyers (as evidence) gifts Clinton had given her, as long as she didn't have them in her possession. Currie subsequently called Lewinsky and went to her apartment to retrieve the gifts.

Prognosis: If Clinton explicitly orchestrated the retrieval, there's a good chance Congress will impeach him over it, since 1) it entails far more aggressive defiance of the law than perjury does and 2) it involves the enlistment of an innocent third party. But Currie's evidently said that Lewinsky, not Clinton, directly prompted the retrieval.

6) Hushing up Lewinsky in 1997. The report says that, in the summer of 1997, 1) Clinton asked Lewinsky to keep their affair secret and 2) he tried to get her a new job that would bring her back to the White House. The report portrays this as an attempt to obstruct justice by buying Lewinsky's silence after Jones' lawyers had said they would seek testimony from Clinton's lovers.

Prognosis: Weak. This was six months before Lewinsky was subpoenaed. Criminal intent in these actions is extremely hard to prove.

7) Abusing power. Clinton used government lawyers to file numerous motions, chiefly claims of privilege, to frustrate Starr's investigation and his subpoenas of testimony from Clinton's aides. Starr reportedly likens this to Watergate.

Prognosis: Extremely weak. Only the most partisan Republicans in Congress will accept the argument that mounting a legal defense, within the law, constitutes obstruction of justice or abuse of power.

8) Inducing aides to lie to the grand jury. Clinton falsely denied the affair to his aides. On that basis, his aides reportedly falsely denied it when summoned before the grand jury. Starr portrays this as a deliberate decision by Clinton to let the aides mislead the grand jury.

Prognosis: This is a derivative of Charge No. 1 and will fail for the same reasons.

9) Having sex while talking to members of Congress. According to the report, Lewinsky testified that on two occasions in 1995, Clinton was engaged in a sex act with her while he talked on the phone with a member of Congress.

Prognosis: This will disgust the public and give late-night comedians plenty of material, but it won't add anything to the case for impeachment.

10) Having kinky sex. The report includes graphic accounts of a dozen sexual encounters between Clinton and Lewinsky. Sources told the Washington Post that Lewinsky testified specifically about their use of a cigar on occasion. Starr's team says these details show that Clinton's denial of "sexual relations" is false.

Prognosis: Over time, the inclusion of this material will hurt Starr more than it will Clinton, by overdosing Congress with sexual details and inviting charges of prosecutorial prurience.

11) Silencing Linda Tripp about Kathleen Willey. Starr's team says that, in July 1997, Clinton met with Lewinsky and encouraged her to ask Tripp to keep quiet about Willey, who alleged that Clinton had subjected her (Willey) to an unwanted sexual advance.

Prognosis: This is the truly dangerous sleeper in the report. If proved, it would show that Clinton's alleged cover-up effort extended beyond his consensual affair with Lewinsky to a separate nonconsensual incident. This would almost certainly lead to impeachment.

Bottom line: Unless the Willey incident can be confirmed as advertised, the Starr report delivers no lethal revelations. The suspense of the past four weeks is culminating not with a bang, but with the click of an empty chamber against Clinton's head.




To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (20356)9/11/1998 7:39:00 PM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
Street LifeFriday, September 11, 1998, 7:00 p.m.Markets Rally on Starr Report
By Bethany McLeanTitles of the day: Sex, Lies and The Tape. Close But
Just a Cigar. Starrs and Stains, Sinners and Stocks.
Repentance, Relief and a Rally. Anyway, a contrite
Clinton and a seamy but unsurprising Starr report did
what an optimistic Intel couldn't: Made this market go
up. Despite Intel's happy speech last night, the market
sold off almost 100 points at the opening bell. But it
recovered after the President begged for forgiveness.
("I have sinned," he says.) And after Starr's 445 page
whatever-you-want-to-call-it (the House voted
overwhelmingly in favor of releasing it) was
published--oh boy! The market soared 200 points before
closing up 179.96, at 7795.50. More mea culpas,Clinton!
WAITING FOR STARR.... Just doesn't have the right ring,
does it? But that's what we did today. So take pity on
the poor soul--interns, do you think?--whose job it is
to copy those 445 pages. Anyway, THE report details not
just one, but 11 reasons for impeaching Clinton. But it
contains no nasty surprises (other than the fact that
the dress tested positive, which I guess isn't really a
surprise, but which is definitely nasty). And Clinton's
lawyers issued a 73-page rebuttal, saying among other
things that Clinton did not carry on an 18-month affair
with Lewinsky. Rather, he had "improper conduct" with
her on "certain occasions" in early 1996 and once in
early 1997. So what wasn't really sex only happened a
few times anyway, so it doesn't count. What Wall Street
really wants to know: Was the cigar Cuban?? Oh, and the
report contains not an incriminating word about
Whitewater. Imagine that. After all that angst.
FINANCIAL FOLLIES.... The reason for the big selloff
first thing this morning was a rumor that Lehman
Brothers was going bankrupt. There was talk on the
London International Financial Futures Exchange that a
U.S. investment bank would seek Chapter 11. Wonder why
everyone decided Lehman was the most likely candidate?
Anyway, a Lehman spokesperson vehemently dismissed the
rumors, and said that Lehman has disclosed its losses.
(Last week, Lehman said trading losses in Russia and
other emerging markets would cut its third-quarter net
income by $60 million.) Which is not a big number, as
these things go. Lehman fell as low as $32 7/16, but
closed down just $2 13/16, at $35 13/16. Still, Lehman
is down over 60% from its high. You have to wonder why
the market is worrying so much.
NUMBER GAMES.... So Intel closed up $5 7/8, at $84
15/16, following its positive preannouncement last
night. Gruntal upped its earnings estimates for Intel;
Warburg Dillon Read raised its rating from "hold" to
"buy." No word from Kurlak The Grinch. But we all know
who's really happy. Nelson, of course. Nelson says he's
"like, SO excited." But Intel is still expected to earn
less--some 20% less--this year than it did in 1997.
Does that really justify a PE multiple of 26? While
we're naysaying, let's pick on Oracle, too. Oracle
soared $3 3/8 today after announcing that it beat
analysts' estimates by 4 cents! Yay! But the 20 cents a
share that Oracle reported is LESS than the 27 cents a
share Oracle was supposed to earn this quarter BEFORE
it guided estimates downwards a few months ago. Oh
well. Goldman upgraded Oracle to "market outperformer";
the Pru went from "accumulate" to "strong buy"; Merrill
went from "near term accumulate" to "near term buy."
But Everen DOWNGRADED Oracle to an "immediate term
market perform." Hmmm. Maybe the source of the
disagreement is that the immediate term is not the sameas the near term.
Loose ChangeMy mom says that some kind of poll conducted in Duluth,
MN, showed that while women wanted the Starr report
made public, men didn't. What's that about?... Hong
Kong says it will maintain its currency board system
and the current link to the U.S. dollar. Hong Kong also
says that its market intervention was NOT a breach of
free market principles. Okay, whatever.... Japan's
economy contracted for the third straight quarter for
the first time since 1955. GDP fell 3.3% on an
annualized basis, more than economists' predictions.
And the Nikkei broke 14,000, closing down more than 5%,
at 13,917. Hey, at least we may get a new textbook
example of a "deflationary spiral.".... After the
close, the not-so-Magic Kingdom, a.k.a. Disney, warned
that fourth-quarter earnings will be below last
year's.... At least Dell still says the world is a
wonderful place.... Goldman Sachs cut its 1999 growth
forecast for the U.S. economy to 1.7%, versus 2.7%.
Wonder if that will make Abby any less bullish?... The
August PPI (Producer Price Index) came in weaker than
expected, which may push the Fed toward easing. But CAN
the U.S. cut rates enough to make a difference to the
rest of the world?... S&P revised its foreign and local
currency outlook on 11 Brazilian entities from stable
to negative. So far this month, some $11 billion has
fled Brazil, versus $12 billion in all of August. But
Brazilian stocks rebounded some 13% today on optimism
that a rate hike to almost 50% would stem further
capital outflows.... Primakov becomes the new Prime
Minister of Russia! What a great job, don't you think?
Might be just a wee bit stressful, though....
Treasuries got hammered today.... OfficeMax says it's
in talks for a business combination, but would not
specify with whom it wishes to combine.... Northworst
was up $2 1/8 after reaching a tentative agreement with
pilots to end their strike. But what if the mechanics
strike? I don't want to fly without mechanics,
either.... Venator Group and Sports Authority called
off their almost $1 billion merger because of market
conditions. Who's next? Travelers and Citicorp still
say they're committed to each other, despite the
painful declines in both stocks. Guess misery really
does love company.... Merck was up today on news of a
new drug that may fight depression. And we may all need
it.... So the market went up today. Think we've broken
the Bethany curse? Now THAT would be exciting.
Actually, what's more exciting is that we can all
ignore the stupid market for a WHOLE TWO DAYS!!! Happyweekend!!