Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : SPARKY'S CORNER -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Judy Muldawer who wrote (3625)	9/12/1998 6:19:00 PM
From: Sparky Beardslee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4142

Judy: thanks for your humor from time to time. It is refreshing to take a break from all the volitility. I did finally purchase some CHIR the other day at $15 3/4. If my source is correct, this co. will move from number 2 to number one very quickly. And I would like to go for the ride. I will buy a few shares every week until the news is announced. I am afraid to go short here with Henry and others as it is a sure sign of higher lows when investors short into rallies. I am still long REL, NRVH and CHIR. NRVH seems to be sitting on support going back over a year. Stochastics are very over sold, and we are now getting upgrades due to price. I see a snap back recovery to the $25-$26 area next week or so. REL is a very attractive stock here at $13. I plan on buying more in the weeks ahead. Sparky

To: Judy Muldawer who wrote (3625)	9/13/1998 8:23:00 PM
From: Bruce A. Brotnov	Respond to of 4142

Judy, maybe you and/or your husband can remember what the "high crime" was for which he was to have impeachment hearings? It must have been 10 times worse than Clinton as the lawyers said it has to be a "high crime" (?) for impeachment. It must have been worse than perjury before a grand jury, or 39 other scandals (e.g. filegate). I just don't recall anything other than getting caught spying on the demos and trying to take some of their notes and then he "mislead the people" by saying he was innocent. I wonder what would have happened if he had 100 spin doctors, Hollywood, and 86% of the newspapers voting for him if it would have been any different? <G> Thanks for the date, I read or heard it after I sent the note. Bruce