SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jon Tara who wrote (13835)9/12/1998 3:04:00 AM
From: Terry T.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18444
 
J.T., you appear to have an axe to grind, whereas I am simply a suspicious and distrusting shareholder. But, I do agree this is strange. The timing of the closing, and the post-closing "payment" to ZULU, are also strange.

It appears with the assets purchase format utilized by ESVS and ZULU, the ONLY SEC review will be a comment period on the form of the proxy to be issued to ESVS shareholders for the ESVS shareholder meeting (to convert the preferred being issued to Zulu into ESVS common stock). This is a relatively simple task, and one wonders why it was not done months ago, and why the shareholder meeting was not held months ago.

I am told there has to be an ESVS shareholder meeting to "approve" the conversion of ESVS preferred to ESVS common. Note the irony of ZULU having to wait for ESVS' insider majority to conduct a pro forma shareholder meeting approving the conversion of its preferred stock into common, so that ZULU can get paid for giving up all of its assets, but apparently there is no requirement of an ESVS or ZULU shareholder meeting for the execution and consummation of the assets purchase itself!

On must wonder as well whether the gap between closing the deal, converting the ESVS preferred to pay Zulu, and distributing ESVS stock to Zulu shareholders (or exchanging Zulu for ESVS), is contrived, and a set up for something else!

Regards to all.



To: Jon Tara who wrote (13835)9/12/1998 1:15:00 PM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 18444
 
Jon, I expect no quality dialogue from you concerning Zulu. Your analysis of the 8K will only include your obvious prejudce against Zulu and the deal.