Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Healthcare.com Corporation (Nasdaq: HCDC)was [HDIE] -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Emec who wrote (3632)	9/11/1998 11:44:00 PM
From: MeDroogies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15094

Don't get it? I got it before the country did, because I didn't vote for the asshole. As for it not being about sex.... Let's view it this way. When it WAS supposedly about sex, Clinton's apologists claimed that there was no merit. Now that there IS merit, Clinton's apologists are claiming the report is too GRAPHIC (okay, we were wrong, so let's make it about sex). Where's the beef? Right in that report. As much as I consider it money that could've been better spent (after he was re-elected, it made little sense to continue pursuing this felon, because he was a lame duck anyway), it now vindicates my original position of 6 years ago. It also vindicates the majority of voters who (let's not forget he only got a plurality - twice) NEVER voted for his lame ass. As for public opinion...the public has no opinion but that which is fed to them by the pollsters. My former job in the media allowed me access to the questionnaires used to conduct these polls. Change 2 words, and people who feel it is wasted money goes from 70% to 25%. Basically, when you get to the question of "should the matter be dropped?", the pollsters have already led the polled down a path that can only end up at a 70% number. I have to admit, it's fun. But it ain't science.