Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (65216)	9/12/1998 1:11:00 AM
From: Wildstar	Respond to of 176387

>No, of course not! That was what the judge ruled in the Jones case when it was thrown out< But at the time the question was asked, the judge ordered him to answer the question, and he had no knowledge the testimony was going to be thrown out later. He has to answer the question and tell the truth. Otherwise it's perjury. >The issue in that case was sexual harassment. This is a case of consensual sex. < Yes, but the crux of that case was whether or not Clinton propositioned Jones by dropping his pants. I think it is very relevant to ask if he had previously propositioned other subordinates in a similar fashion.