SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Icabod who wrote (4837)9/12/1998 2:31:00 AM
From: jhild  Respond to of 26163
 
Now there's a rather tortured piece of logic with a twisted headline. 78 Reasons were all about about sugar and long term consequences of using it. No where was stevia or Touch of Nature mentioned. I am sure you mean to imply that Touch of Nature should be used as a replacement. But the form of stevia Amazon is selling is only sold as a dietary supplement to avoid FDA testing issues. Which of course means that there has been no, none, zippo long term studies done of Touch of Nature to indicate that it is even as safe as sugar.

Well, I may be exaggerating a bit here, as I guess Dr. Jorge Daaboul has tasted it and commented that it tastes sweet.



To: Icabod who wrote (4837)9/12/1998 2:37:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Respond to of 26163
 
4 REASONS TO NOT USE "TOUCH OF NATURE" INSTEAD OF SUGAR

1. ToN is a dietary supplement and not a sweetener
2. No medical studies have been done to show ToN does not cause cancer or other maladies
3. ToN is far far more costly than sugar
4. Stevia is banned by the FDA as an unsafe food additive

- Jeff


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News