SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wildstar who wrote (64574)9/12/1998 2:03:00 PM
From: StockMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
WildStar,
Re -- Did Newt, Kennedy, Johnson, Chenowith, etc. commit a felony by perjury?

did Clinton? Did Newt Kennedy, Johnson etc.. have an "investigator" look over their shoulders at every move for 5 years? (Can we say persecution?)

As usual being a closed minded person, you have read one side of the story and formed a conclusion as to wether or not a felony has been comitted.

Clintons answers IN THE COURT SYSTEM were LEGALLY ACCURATE. And many lawyers on TV think that Clinton was right.



To: Wildstar who wrote (64574)9/12/1998 9:37:00 PM
From: kash johal  Respond to of 186894
 
OT,

Clinton's opponent in the last election was a well regarded Bob Dole.

Bob served the american public for many many years.

He stated that "he did not know that tobacco caused cancer etc".

In fact he was not sure that it was any more dangerous than milk!

Now, Bob was pandering to the Tobacco lobby and most folks think that this sort of stuff is OK.

IMHO any person who panders a substance know to kill countless folks, so he can get campaign contributions and counter the demagrophics is a complete and utter scumbag.

IMHO, Bill is a scumbag as well, but he was voted by the public as the scumbag they wanted to run the country.

I believe that morality and being a politician are Oxymoronic.

Regards,

Kash