SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should Clinton resign? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: majormember who wrote (117)9/12/1998 10:50:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 567
 
Sunday, Sept. 13, 1998
JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION EDITORIAL



Clinton must find the courage to resign

This joint editorial reflects the conclusions of the editorial boards of both
The Atlanta Journal and The Atlanta Constitution, acting separately and
independently.

The American people seem doomed to a guided tour of hell in
days to come, exposed against their wishes to the details of a
particularly seamy presidential scandal.

Only one person can spare us that nightmare. By resigning,
President Clinton would be surrendering the office he worked his
entire life to achieve, and would give his enemies the reward they
have long sought. No one as proud and stubborn as the president
could take such a step easily.

Yet, by making that sacrifice, Clinton would save the nation from a
protracted trauma that will otherwise cripple the presidency and
Congress and further discredit a political system already held in
low esteem. A president more concerned with the national interest
than his own self-preservation would realize that resignation is his
only responsible option.

Sadly, Bill Clinton has shown himself incapable of such sacrifice.
He is a complex man with many attractive qualities, but in the end
his character has been defined by his crass selfishness. It is that
trait--perjury and adultery are merely its symptoms--that has
rendered him unfit to continue as president.

At repeated points in the progression of this scandal, Clinton has
faced a critical choice: "Should I do what is best for the country,
or should I do what is best for me?" If at any of those points,
Clinton had chosen to do what was best for the country, we would
not be in this mess. But he could not.

Look how it began: In late 1995, the Paula Jones
sexual-harassment case was already hanging over Clinton's head,
and his political opponents had made it clear that they thirsted for
his blood. Yet, despite the danger to his presidency, Clinton
decided to begin a sexual relationship with a 21-year-old intern
named Monica Lewinsky.

That reckless decision--to gamble his presidency on the ability of a
starry-eyed young woman to keep her silence--has been
described as terrible judgment, and it is. But even more troubling,
it demonstrates that Clinton valued his own gratification too highly
and took his duty as president too lightly.

That choice between his duty as president and his own self-interest
presented itself again when Clinton was asked, in a sworn
deposition in the Jones case, whether he had sexual relations with
Lewinsky. As a father and husband, his natural instinct was to
deny the charge and commit perjury. According to the polls, most
Americans do not judge Clinton harshly for that decision. They
accept his explanation that he was trying to protect himself and his
family.

However, the act of committing perjury has consequences for the
president of the United States that do not apply when the crime is
committed by most husbands and fathers. The president takes an
oath before the entire nation to uphold the law; by committing a
felony, he violates that solemn oath.

Because of the nature of his perjury, Clinton's decision to lie will
not by itself generate the public anger necessary for impeachment.
It is nonetheless important, because it satisfies the constitutional
requirement that impeachment involve "high crimes and
misdemeanors." At some later date, it and other charges could
provide the technical foundation for impeachment motivated by
other, less legal considerations.

Clinton's most cowardly and indefensible refusal to put the national
interest ahead of his own well-being involves his protracted
attempt to conceal his perjury and infidelity. Over the past several
months, he has enlisted the full force and majesty of his office in
defense of his deception, and in the process damaged the
presidency both as an institution and as a national symbol.

For example, his forceful and falsely sincere denial of an affair with
"that woman, Miss Lewinsky" put his Cabinet members in a tough
position. They had to either publicly proclaim their confidence in
the president, or resign. He forced them to put their personal and
professional credibility on the line in defense of what he knew to
be a lie.

Likewise, because Clinton refused to tell the truth, Secret Service
agents were compelled to testify before a grand jury,
compromising what had been assumed to be a confidential
relationship between a president and the agents assigned to
protect him. And when White House aides were summoned to
testify about what they knew, government lawyers fought the
subpoenas on a claim of executive privilege. The courts overruled
that claim, a decision that will haunt future presidents who want to
consult honestly with staff on legally delicate matters.

When he first looked the American people in the eye and denied
his infidelity, Clinton might not have envisioned the full impact of
his deception on other people. But as the consequences became
clear, and as he saw the toll his deception was taking on members
of his staff and Cabinet, he had the obligation to intervene, to halt
the weakening of the presidency by the simple act of telling the
truth.

But to save his own hide, he remained silent.

Finally, on Aug. 17, unable any longer to maintain fiction as fact,
Clinton faced the nation. Here was his last chance to put the
interests of the nation above his own. By coming clean, by laying
the truth on the table for all to see, Clinton had the opportunity to
move the scandal to a quick resolution. And again, he failed. Even
then, he could not see beyond his own narrow needs; he could not
summon the courage to do what was right for the nation.

With the filing of the Starr report, the process toward
impeachment will accelerate. Until the contents of that report are
clear and President Clinton has had a chance to respond, final
judgment on impeachment would be premature. The forced
removal of a president through constitutional means is a grave
matter that should not be handled hastily.

The case for resignation, on the other hand, is already clear. At the
moment, Clinton's selfishness still serves as a blindfold, rendering
him unable to see the seriousness of his situation. But just as time
eventually forced him to admit both his lies and his infidelity, it may
eventually force him to consider resignation.

Congressional Democrats are already abandoning the nominal
head of their party. At some point in the next few weeks, they may
go to him and ask him to remove his blindfold and look honestly at
the ugly spectacle that he has wrought.

And maybe then he will find the courage to do what is best for his
country.
accessatlanta.com



To: majormember who wrote (117)9/12/1998 10:57:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 567
 
World's Great Newspapers say that Clinton is doomed:

U.S. Information Agency

Office of Public Liaison
STARR INVESTIGATION: CLINTON INCREASINGLY 'ISOLATED'

AS 'DAY OF RECKONING' APPROACHES


Amid reports that special prosecutor Kenneth Starr is expected to deliver his report to Congress summarizing his inquiry into the Lewinsky case perhaps as early as the end of this week, foreign observers viewed PresidentClinton as increasingly "isolated" as he faces the days ahead. Writers were particularly struck by "critical
commentaries" of the president's conduct voiced in recent days by prominent members of the Democratic Party.Editorial after editorial echoed the sentiments of London's conservative Times, which stressed: "In Congress, Mr.Clinton has barely a defender of note left. And it is friendly fire, not Republican sniping, that has holed his ship." A
number of commentators raised the "specter of impeachment," which Milan's centrist, top-circulation Corrieredella Sera and others deemed "more real" now than previously. Others argued, however, that even though "moreDemocrats are distancing themselves" from the president, "no important leader from [among] the Democrats has announced...in favor of impeachment." Dailies in Britain, Germany, France and Belgium joined Oslo's independent tabloid Dagbladet in worrying that, as a result of his "handling of the Lewinsky issue," the president
had created a "breach of faith in U.S. domestic politics...that could have dire consequences" in the global arena.In pursuing that argument, London's conservative Times intoned: "[Mr. Clinton] can no longer assure such vital Congress votes as the funding for the IMF that is urgently required to calm the financial storms. Resignation now,
before the risk of an impeachment that could tip an already unstable world towards depression, looks increasinglythe best option." Following are additional themes in the commentary:

'CLINTON'S FATE IN HANDS OF DEMOCRATS'--The majority of editorialists deemed that President Clinton's future depended on the "attitudes of those who should be his natural defenders--the Democrats." Many
cautioned, however, that, given the upcoming mid-term elections, "few [members of the president's party] are willing to risk their re-election for him." Germany's right-of-center Frankfurter Allegemeine predicted:
"Until...[Mr.] Starr presents his report to Congress, Mr. Clinton will have few friends--and after Starr's presentation, there may be even fewer." London's conservative Daily Telegraph viewed senior Democrats as "prepared to regard impeachment, not as a constitutional crisis, but as a constitutional mechanism" to remove the president from office.

CONDUCT DEMANDED OF A HEAD OF STATE--Madrid's conservative ABC spoke of the president's troubles as an "American tragedy." Oslo's conservative Aftenposten concluded that Mr. Clinton "had undermined
the dignity of the presidency," adding: "Even in a situation where the great majority of Americans feel that he has done a good job...there is [nonetheless] an onerous burden of confidence that any nation would like to have in its elected leader." Hong Kong's independent South China Morning Post insisted: "America has a right to expect much better from its president. In particular, if survival is the only game Mr. Clinton can now pursue, one has to ask what he has to offer."

This survey is based on 25 reports from 12 countries, September 6 - 9.

EDITOR: Kathleen J. Brahney

To Go Directly To Quotes By Region, Click Below

| EUROPE | | MIDDLE EAST | | EAST ASIA AND THE PACIFIC | | AFRICA |

| LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN |

EUROPE

BRITAIN: "Dead In The Water"

The lead editorial in the conservative Times maintained (9/9) under the above headline: "The one word from Bill Clinton's journeys to Russia, Ulster and Ireland that echoed back across the Atlantic was the word 'sorry.' Back in Washington this week, the isolated incumbent of the White House can take the full measure of the damage that
his long refusal to pronounce that word has wreaked.... In Congress, Mr. Clinton has barely a defender of note left. And it is friendly fire, not Republican sniping, that has holed his ship.... Visibly estranged even from his wife, the president is politically so emasculated that he can no longer assure such vital Congress votes as the funding for the IMF that is urgently required to calm the financial storms. Resignation now, before the risk of an impeachment
that could tip an already unstable world towards depression, looks increasingly the best option."

"One Way Or Another, Clinton Is Doomed"

Under the above headline, the conservative Daily Telegraph had this op-ed piece (9/9) by Washington correspondent Hugo Gurden: "Ever a gambler, Mr. Clinton is betting Congress will flinch before he does. But his is a losing hand. Senior Democrats are fleeing from him, disgusted, angry, betrayed and prepared to regard impeachment not as a constitutional crisis but as a constitutional mechanism."

"Clinton's Support Starts To Crumble"

The centrist Independent noted (9/8): "As the leader of his own church urged Bill Clinton to resign the presidency, anxiety was mounting yesterday about the huge toll that the Monica Lewinsky scandal may take on both the work program of Congress in Washington and the election prospects of Democratic candidates across the country.... Alarm bells are sounding that a busy work schedule, ranging from votes on next year's federal budget to an important Senate debate on changing election fundraising laws, will be sidetracked by the scandal....
Washington observers were last night questioning whether the president had been hobbled--his authority soundermined to the point of rendering him ineffective and the country rudderless."

"The Matadors Close In"

The independent Financial Times featured this op-ed analysis (9/8): "Adding to the White House headache is thfact that the scandal is now starting to hurt Al Gore, who is already under a cloud because of a JusticDepartment investigation into... possible campaign finance abuses in the 1996 election. Although Mr. Gore habeen a strong supporter of Mr. Clinton since the scandal broke, he needs the backing of the Democratic Partfor his planned campaign in 2000. That could require Mr. Gore to begin the task of trying to distance himself
from the man whose legacy he had planned to make a key electoral attraction.... For the rest of the world, therseems bound to be a period of great uncertainty."

FRANCE: "Clinton's Enemies Careful Prior To November Elections"

Laurent Zecchini declared in left-of-center Le Monde (9/9): "While there is no indication when Kenneth Starr wilbe handing over his report to the Congress, a number of very critical commentaries made over the weekenabout Bill Clinton have been feeding speculation.... Nevertheless, Republican leaders want to remain careful so as
not to become the targets of accusations that they are going on a witch hunt, particularly prior to the Novembeelections.... These elections will certainly play in Bill Clinton's favor because as long as his popularity remainhigh, no one will want to engage in a high risk strategy which voters will interpret as 'partisan tactics.'"

"Bill Clinton Abandoned By His Own Supporters"

According to left-of-center Liberation's Patrick Sabatier (9/8): "Upon returning to Washington, President Clintowill be able to observe that the political support of his own party has been dwindling, because of the legislativelections next November.... While popular support for the president is still high...in Congress, Democrats anRepublicans alike are adopting a cautious attitude...Bill Clinton may be able to once again ask for and get thnation's forgiveness on Friday. He may even be able to survive. But the question that is being asked more and
more often is: 'Can he still govern the nation?'"

GERMANY: "End Of Clinton Era Approaching"

Right-of-center Fuldaer Zeitung asserted (9/7): "The U.S. president is no longer able to escape his debaucherieand his attempts to hush them up. His tortuous confessions and his half-hearted statements of remorse havharmed rather than improved the situation. What can be more humiliating than having to speak about his own sexual mistakes in two foreign countries? This wounds the pride of a nation which likes to present itself as the moral judge of the world. Clinton has lost credibility and charisma. This coincides with a return to economic
sobriety in the United States.... In addition, there are numerous international trouble spots which the United Stateis unable to deal with. Thus a calamitous end of the Clinton era is coming closer. It would be better than an endless calamity."

"Critical Voices"

Klaus-Dieter Frankenberger had this to say in right-of-center Frankfurter Allgemeine (9/8): "Maybe President Clinton really believed that his half-hearted confession...of August 17 would help him get out of the troubleswhich he inflicted upon himself.... But the Lewinsky affair pestered him even in Moscow...and in Ireland it forced
him to apologize.... And now, even Democratic senators doubt his moral authority. Democratic senators, whose words and whose voices count, are now talking about the constitutional duties of Congress to decide about impeachment proceedings.

"These senators are not necessarily Clinton's 'friends,' but they are halfway reliable allies against a Republican majority in Congress. This means that the costs of gaining a majority will rise, while the president's capacity to act will be reduced.... Until special counsel Kenneth Starr presents his report to Congress, Mr. Clinton will have few friends--and after Starr's presentation, there may be even fewer. Those who expect a vigorous president in the coming months will be disappointed. Not all Democratic critics of Clinton are simply interested in decency and morality in the White House. Some of them, of course, are also thinking about election day on November 3."

"Bill Clinton, King Lear"

Under the above headline, Josef Joffe opined in centrist Sueddeutsche Zeitung of Munich (9/8): "You can look at it from whatever angle you like. The end of the Clinton presidency has come. Will he resign? This is not his nature, since he has been able to pull his head out from the noose several times in the past.... He will spend his days and nights conceiving defensive strategies by appeasing his party's supporters and by trying to bribe his opponents. In foreign policy, he will be paralyzed. He will be accused of diverting attention from his mistakes if he takes to arms, and of cowardice if he goes down on his knees when confronted with the Saddams and the bin Ladens of this world. In the end, he will wander through the White House such as King Lear. His resignation would be better for him, the nation, and the world."

ITALY: "Worrying Developments"

Andrea di Robilant filed this from New York for centrist, influential La Stampa (9/9): "This week or next, at the latest, special prosecutor Kenneth Starr will hand his dossier on the Lewinsky case over to Congress. With that day of reckoning approaching, more Democrats are distancing themselves from Bill Clinton. This morning the president will meet with the Democratic House leaders...and will implore them to help him in the forthcoming, decisive weeks. But it will not be an easy meeting: In only two months there are the mid-term elections, and the Lewinsky case...now risks making many Democratic representatives lose their seats.... For the White House the most worrying development is the fact that Democrats are distancing themselves.... Yesterday even Barbara Boxer, whose daughter is married to Hillary Clinton's younger brother, joined the group.... Having said all this, so
far no important leader from the Democrats has announced himself in favor of President Clinton's impeachment."

"A Mortal Blow"

Alessandra Farkas observed from New York in centrist, top-circulation Corriere della Sera (9/9): "With the day of reckoning coming closer, Clinton is making every effort to present an image of normality to his nation.... From the powerful lobbies to the daily commentaries there is only one chorus: Clinton's political prestige has received a
mortal blow by the Lewinsky scandal."

"Clinton's Fate In Hands Of The Democrats"

Franco Pantarelli filed this from New York for centrist, influential La Stampa (9/8): "Bill Clinton is increasingly isolated, and, judging from his silence, increasingly undecided about what to do. His fate, after all, no longer seems to depend on the initiatives he may take, but on the future attitude of those who should be his natural
defenders--the Democrats. And on this front came several confirmations yesterday that only a few, at this point, are willing to risk their re-election for him.... The issue that Congress will have to face when Kenneth Starr finally turns in his report, is between 'impeachment' and a 'motion of censorship.'"

"Specter Of Impeachment"

Alessandra Farkas wrote from New York for centrist, top-circulation Corriere della Sera (9/8): "The circle is closing around Bill Clinton, pressed by Republican Congressmen and left alone by fellow party members.... Congress is resuming work this week after summer recess.... The specter of impeachment seems more real."

"A Decisive Week Ahead"

In leading business Il Sole-24 Ore, Alessandro Plateroti commented from New York (9/8): "A decisive week for the fate of the Clinton presidency.... The U.S. president is waiting, in a very hot atmosphere, for Prosecutor Starr to deliver to Congress the results of his investigation.... And rumors about possible new Democratic candidates for the presidential elections are beginning to circulate in Washington, mainly about Bill Bradley."

BELGIUM: "From Irish Ballad To American Way Of The Cross"

Washington correspondent Nathalie Mattheiem observed in independent Le Soir (9/9): "The phenomenon of the 'lame duck' that semi-paralyzes the presidents at the end of their term has never been so cruel. Nobody is going
in for the kill yet, but depending on the gravity of the facts described by Ken Starr, the pressure might rise to ask for the coup de grace which would soothe quite a lot of sufferings. The Democrats, even as minority (in the House ) will weigh heavily on this outcome. Will they succeed in having a simple 'censure', morally humiliating but
politically inoffensive, adopted?"

NORWAY: "Serious Breach Of Faith In American Politics"

Researcher Svein Melby of the Norwegian Foreign Policy Insitute commented in independent tabloid Dagbladet (9/7) "President Clinton's handling of the Lewinsky issue has created a breach of faith in U.S. domestic politics...that could have dire consequences for the nation's international role as well. The lack of confidence in the president raises serious questions about whether [Mr.] Clinton can continue to act with the required credibility in the international arena. Clinton's resignation may prove to be the only way out of the difficult situation he has caused in American politics."

"Clinton In Danger Of Being Pushed Out"

Conservative Aftenposten concluded (9/6): "While Bill Clinton has been visiting Russia, Northern Ireland and Ireland, his political platform at home has become so undermined that he could be pushed out of the White House. The network around him is unraveling with remarkable speed. Bill Clinton has squandered his private and public credibility and undermined the dignity of the presidency. Even in a situation where the great majority of Americans feel that he has done a good job as president, there is [nonetheless] an onerous burden on the
confidence that any nation would like to have in its elected leader."

SPAIN: "Head Of State"

Otto de Habsburgo mused in conservative ABC (9/9): "The current American tragedy serves to place the functions of a head of state in bold relief.... The head of state is a symbol, a representative, but above all, a personality who should serve as an example for the citizenry.... [In this context], one may admire Clinton's policies or disagree with them, but what is clear is that as a person he does not provide an example for the United States."

"Clinton's Calvary"

Independent El Mundo observed (9/5): "Upon returning to Washington Bill Clinton will come face-to-face with reality. Distance has not served to disentangle him from [his affair with] the young intern, the repercussions of which have pursued him from Russia to Ireland. This scandal will not die, and Clinton is traversing his way of the
cross on the world stage and with Hillary in tow. The worst part is that those now taking shots at the president are his own friends. Democratic Senator Joseph Lieberman has placed the president's moral authority in doubt by sharply criticizing his 'immorality' just when he was basking in the smiles of Irish eyes, something he will miss in
Washington.... Speculation in American political circles now even includes talk of the president's resignation, despite the patiently repeated denials of his spokesman, [Mike] McCurry, [who has himself] resigned."

EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC

HONG KONG: "Clinton's Crisis"

The independent, English-language South China Morning Post's editorial stated (9/9): "Whenever he appears to have suffered the final humiliation, yet another blow seems to land on President Bill Clinton's shoulders. In the space of a month, the Comeback Kid of American politics has become Banana Skin Bill.... The polls still give the president high ratings, but his standing may be more fragile than it looks--Richard Nixon was still doing well in the polls in the early stages of the Watergate scandal. Above all...his ability to serve out his second term probably hangs on the economy. If the Dow Jones crashes, and the downturn in Asia and Russia throws Americans out of
jobs in significant numbers, the game will be up, whatever fresh maneuvers his legal team weaves....

"But America has a right to expect much better from its president. In particular, if survival is the only game Mr. Clinton can now pursue, one has to ask what he has to offer."

MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA

ISRAEL: "Save Billy"

Senior analyst Yoel Marcus emphasized in independent Haaretz (9/8): "During his stop in Ireland, President Clinton made a desperate attempt to present the Monica affair as an insignificant blunder.... One cannot avoid the impression that his appeals to various nations...to follow Ireland's peace-making example was directed mostly at the Israelis.... Reason: Israel has close ties with the U.S. Congress...and the Jewish lobby has a considerable say in the America's corridors of power. Clinton's call from Moscow to Prime Minister Netanyahu and his decision to send SMEC Ross over are the acts of a president in distress seeking the help of the Israeli prime minister. The least Israel can do is help stage a signing ceremony at the White House at the end of the month.... This may not salvage the peace process but it could avoid an explosion and, perhaps, also save Billy."

AFRICA

GHANA: "A Probe Gone Too Far"

Under the headline above, K. B. Asante judged in the government-owned Daily Graphic (9/6): "The present American practice of sustained probe and ruthless exposure of leaders has much to commend it. It shows without doubt that not even the head of state is above the law or outside the imperatives of good behavior.... But does not the relentless probe and naked exposure of the frailties of the leader lead to public cynicism and erosion of confidence in the structures of governance?"

LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN

ARGENTINA: "Tension Increased Between Clinton And Democrats"

Jorge Elias, Washington-based correspondent for daily-of-record La Nacion wrote (9/9), "Everything is taking place amid the campaign for the elections to take place on November 3.... The impact of the Lewinsky affair is not as clear in the shrinkage of votes for Democrats as in the participation of people in elections, usually low. That is why the electoral forecast announces for Democrats... bigger losses than the majority of both houses in the U.S. Congress, controlled by Republicans since 1995. A Republican poll shows that because of the Lewinsky scandal, moral and religion are the main concerns among the U.S. electorate, almost as important as drugs and
crime. In favor of Democrats there is only economy.... Democrats are disappointed by Clinton's behavior and are not motivated to vote.... The National Journal, a prestigious magazine in Washington, indicated yesterday that 57 people, among them politicians, TV personalities, newspapers and magazines requested in only one week that Clinton should leave the White House. That number should be added to the 111 already gathered against Clinton. Among them, five Republican Senators and 26 representatives."

"Moral Issues"

Ana Baron, leading Clarin's Washington-based correspondent, pointed out (9/8): "After [President Clinton's] August 17 speech, when he admitted his improper relationship with Monica Lewinsky, nobody dares rule out the fact that moral issues may be very profitable [in the November elections.] The situation has changed so much since then that, as things are today, everything is possible.... At present, there are more and more Democrats who think that if independent prosecutor Starr's report...proves that Clinton committed perjury and obstruction of justice, abuse of power or blackmailed witnesses to hide his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, it will be necessary to start an impeachment, whatever the political cost may be. In this sense, even though the economic situation is still basically positive, the impeachment option appears now inevitable."

CUBA: "Democrats Distancing Themselves From Clinton"

This news item datelined Washington appeared in Cuban Communist Party daily Granma (9/8): "One possible effect of the Lewinsky affair is that some members on the Democratic rolls are distancing themselves from President William Clinton in order to prevent an eventual disaster in the November congressional elections. According to EFE, quoting White House advisers, Clinton is becoming more isolated every day."

For more information, please contact:

U.S. Information Agency

Office of Public Liaison

Telephone: (202) 619-4355
usia.gov

It's amazing that world opinion has galvanized so quickly against Clinton.







To: majormember who wrote (117)9/12/1998 12:02:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 567
 
Boston Globe

No escape for Clinton

By John Ellis, 09/12/98

Thirty-six boxes of detail were an unexpectedly
cinematic touch. They allowed Congress and the
country an opportunity to contemplate the full
magnitude of President Clinton's misconduct and
mendacity. More than 400 pages of narrative
spelled out the Office of the Independent
Counsel's case. But it was the video images of the
boxes that stuck. Clinton's character had been
reduced to its essence.

The other image that lingered was of the president
at a fund-raiser in Orlando, Fla. Watching him, it became apparent that he
could no longer look people in the eye. Back in January, he looked us all in
the eye and announced that he ''did not have sexual relations with that
woman, Miss Lewinsky.'' But in Orlando, his eyes wandered about the
room as he spoke, searching for escape instead of absolution.

There is and will be no escape, of course. The charges on the table are
serious and substantial. The Office of the Independent Counsel accuses the
president of perjury, witness tampering, obstruction of justice, and abuse of
power. The case for perjury seems open and shut. The rest of the charges
are, at some level, inarguable. They are the lies compounded. We've
watched them develop over the course of the last eight months.

The White House has adopted a four-part political strategy to deal with its
final crisis. Its components are contrition, proportionality, defamation, and
delay. Part 1, contrition, suffered from its start. The real Bill Clinton would
have none of it on Aug. 17, when he offered not one line of apology and nine
paragraphs of invective aimed directly at Kenneth Starr. The repackaged Bill
Clinton is now the sorriest man in America, moving from one venue to the
next to express his regret. Believing the latter president requires that one
disbelieve the former, even though Clinton was utterly convincing in his rage.

Nevertheless, it has been decided - for the moment anyway - that only full
contrition will do. Various and sundry Democrats are dispatched to reiterate
the depths of Clinton's sorrow. Lesser Cabinet members recount his anguish
and pain. The secretary of state lends her blessing. The evangelicals are
courted. Total hangdog has replaced the modified limited hangout.

The problem with the total hangdog is that Clinton hates it. He didn't get to
be president by playing defense - groveling and sniveling and apologizing
abjectly. He believes first and foremost in the politics of attack. So Part 1
will soon segue into Parts 2 and 3 - proportionality and defamation.

Proportionality argues that Clinton's perjury, obstruction of justice, and
abuse of power are bad, but not as bad as Nixon's subornation of perjury,
obstruction of justice, and abuse of power. The former, it has and will be
said, relates ''only'' to consensual sexual relations. The latter amounted to an
assault on the US Constitution. Clinton's remaining handlers hope that
television talking heads will parrot this argument in the president's defense.
It's not much of an argument, but it's the best they can do.

Part 2 of the proportionality gambit will be Hillary Rodham Clinton's speech,
which the White House hopes she will deliver next week. The argument
therein will be straightforward. She forgives him. Their daughter forgives him.
So if they forgive him, you should, too. White House operatives think that
the proportionality argument gets them about halfway home, shoring up their
base of blacks and patronage new Democrats. The other half they hope to
gain through blackmail and intimidation. Salon magazine reported Thursday
that the White House is working on a ''doomsday scenario'' in which
damaging information about ''Republicans, Democrats, and journalists'' is
distributed for public consumption. This report is taken seriously in
Washington generally and on Capitol Hill specifically. ''These people,'' said
one longtime Democratic operative, ''will do anything to hold onto power.''

The final part of the strategy is simply delay. The White House's greatest fear
is that the release of the Starr report will create a political stampede for
Clinton's resignation. They do not want anyone to trust the authority of their
initial reaction to reading the contents of the independent counsel's report.
They want to add all the qualifiers, a thousand legal arguments and
diversions, in the hope that time's passage will simply exhaust the public's
attention span.

It won't work. Bill Clinton's presidency ended yesterday afternoon on the
World Wide Web. He has disgraced himself and the high office it was his
privilege to hold. His political support will collapse in the coming days, and,
like a puppet cut loose from its strings, he will fall in a heap on the floor.

The consequences for the country of his being allowed to continue in office
are simply unacceptable. We cannot abide another two-and-a-half years of
explaining to our children why gross misconduct goes unpunished. We
cannot abide another two-and-a-half years of explaining to ourselves why
integrity and character don't matter. We cannot abide another
two-and-a-half years of shameless and faithless presidential leadership.

Bill Clinton will leave office soon because he was and is unworthy of our
trust. The sooner it happens, the better everyone will feel.

John Ellis is a consultant at the Rasky/Baerlein Group.
boston.com