Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Intrepid1 who wrote (112)	9/12/1998 9:53:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

The alleged leaks I suspect will be shown to have come from the WH. JLA

To: Intrepid1 who wrote (112)	9/12/1998 12:26:00 PM
From: Jay8088	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

What is his end game? I believed he is empowered by DOJ to find illegal acts committed by the executive branch. The reason for 'independence' is because DOJ cannot investigate its own boss without bias. What happened to Whitewater, Filegate, Travelgate cases? Why don't you read the Starr Report more carefully? There it states in black and white that SEPARATE reports on these cases are close to completion and would be delivered to the Congress shortly. Monica Lewinsky / Paula Jones perjury case report was delivered earlier because it was already delayed for 7 months due to Clinton's spurious claims of Executive Privilege and the fact that he denied the facts all that time. What did speed up finally? DNA test on Monica's dress. That got the thing moving again. The sad fact is that the only way to get any truth out of our president is to have a DNA evidence. Otherwise he would deny it forever - it's his words against Monica's words, right?

To: Intrepid1 who wrote (112)	9/12/1998 3:54:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1533

"And don't you find it a tad suspicious that all the "revelations" in today's report were already widely known? This proves Starr and his team of inquisitors were illegally leaking Grand Jury testimony." Don't you find it interesting that the White House spin machine was able to publish a rebuttal before the report was issued citing these so called illegal leaks? Do you think that you would trust the leaks of someone who is supposedly politically motivated to get you to publish such a 'rebuttal'? Or do you think it more logical that the spin machine actually has someone inside, and that the leaks are actually the responsibility of the White House? Barb