Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTH AFRICAN MINING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EZbeliever who wrote (154)	9/12/1998 1:13:00 PM
From: JS	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 472

I'm glad that someone else sees that Rangy has a problem. There are lots of good juniors out there that are just as undervalued but you're right about cash, especially at a time like this. Do you have any good ones that you would recommend?(with a good cash position that is)

To: EZbeliever who wrote (154)	9/12/1998 5:51:00 PM
From: POLARBEAR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 472

EZbeliever, regarding your comment: "I have an important question that beggs a thorough answer. As you recall, I posted a comment on Kitco regarding the current lack of working capital of RANGY. The reason I usually insist on a strong cash position with my resourse companies is so they can hang on in tough times. Your response was " who cares about cash on hand with the level of production about to come online". Something tells me this could be more of an issue than you think, or are saying. Please provide a thorough analysis of the current bond obligation, including the possible dilutive effects of the options or warrants contained therein. A very valid concern, but I'm just NOT seeing this as a major issue. I'll attempt to address it when I get the time. I've built in a Q and A section into my website. I certainly don't have the time to spend answering every question that arises, and am hoping that someone within RANGY steps up to help, but I'll work on it as time permits. In short, my understanding is that the bonds aren't due until 2001. RANGY has more than enough cash/assets to see through the development of Syama, and Syama heap leach. This will more than generate enough capital for other projects....unless gold drops to $200 and stays there. PB PS. The 15 or so Million that Rangy has coming from SUF will more than cover the entire cost of Syama heapleach. AT least 200,000 ounces over 4 years (50k a year) at $130 will generate a lot of $$$ by itself. Thanks for the question and keep 'em coming! And remember, I'm not Mr. Know-it-all. Maybe there is something I'm missing, but I can certainly say if there is I haven't found it.