Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (5137)	9/12/1998 11:40:00 AM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

jlallen I forgive you and your outbursts....be tolerant brother and let others who are more loving spread their love....guess its hand to hand combat fer you again....tell us all who wins ......

To: jlallen who wrote (5137)	9/12/1998 11:41:00 AM
From: Who, me?	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Let your opinion be heard! Vote on line at MSNBC: msnbc.com

To: jlallen who wrote (5137)	9/12/1998 11:48:00 AM
From: Las Vegas Lou	Respond to of 13994

Could Slick be hanging on for another reason? He has run up an untold number of legal fees. Thanks to his own tax increase a person has to earn $2 in order to pay off 1$ of debt. After expenses, payroll taxes and income taxes are subtracted about 50% of each earned dollar remains. Therefore if Slick owes $4,000,000 he would have to earn $8,000,000 to get to zero. If he resigns, his earning capacity would be severely curtailed. Could he be hanging on because he is really a card carrying member from the decade of greed?