Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dipsey who wrote (27575)	9/12/1998 1:13:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

Dipsey, I think that because Clinton was trained in the Law, he was well aware of the thin line between "truth and lie" he was stepping. My point is that his judgment might have very well been that unless there was intercourse it was not a "sexual relationship". I wonder, by the way why it is that he did not go all the way? Could it be to live himself that "safety hatch" (not a sexual relationship?) Others in high office have done the same (not "go all the way so as to be able to "truthfully" say I never committed adultery). I also agree with you, that the final decision as to whether Clinton perjured himself or not should be decided by the Congress. I think that there is room for different interpretations (for instance in the movie Rashomon, where they did "go all the way") and am not going to prejudge (as if anyone is asking me). Zeev