Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (181)	9/12/1998 2:21:00 PM
From: K A Anderson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

"Except there were legions of women ready to file suit against Packwood, a number of them went on 60 minutes even, mountains of evidence etc." Have you checked the amount of women making accusations against Clinton? KAA

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (181)	9/12/1998 2:33:00 PM
From: dumbmoney	Respond to of 1533

This in contrast to Clinton where there was the Paula Jones case (thrown out - obvious political agenda propelling the case anyway) Jones is very credible. The Monica revelations support her claims - which were made long before Monicagate. (The case was thrown out for purely legal reasons - not having anything to do with the facts). Kathleen Willy is even more credible. How many others are afraid to come forward, because of what the White House slime team (Sid Blumenthal, Bob Bennet, et al) will do to them?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (181)	9/12/1998 2:51:00 PM
From: Jay8088	Respond to of 1533

Has Packwood done anything sumilar to what Clinton did to Katherin Willey? Wasn't packwood accused of somethign like- uninvited kissing? Physical abuse? What are you talking about? Could you elaborate on that? And what happened to those 'lawsuits'?? Did anyone follow up after Packwood's resignation? Paula Jones followed up with hers until it was thrown out by Clinton's FORMER STUDENT AND APPOINTEE. I hear that now that judge Weber is trying to cover her track - claiming 'new information' she didn't know before.